Knowledge as Movement and Dwelling

From Knowledge-land-scape
Revision as of 15:20, 26 January 2025 by Saskia (talk | contribs)

Landmarks are defining features in the land that traditionally play an important role in Inuit topographical understandings of their land and its resources. They are important orienting features to keep one's bearing while travelling and to determine where one is located at any given moment[1].

As a figure in this Knowledge-Land-Scape, "Landmarks" perform the materialization of certain findings and emergent insights along the way.

This particular one, marks my understanding of how some knowledge only comes into being through movement- or may only exist as movement.

"Becoming nomadic" , the notion of transience and of "passing", as Rosi Braidotti refers to such ways of knowing, binds us to multiple others in a web of complex interrelations, kinship, social bonding and flexible citizenship (Braidotti, 2006 p.271). This is not knowledge that can be learnt from a book, nor is it knowledge that can be categorized or transferred for shared understanding outside of its relational events (Ingold, 2022). As Ingold points out, this kind of knowledge references the world, not other books(Ingold, 2013 Making p.15).

My continous moving in-between countries, territories, timezones, languages, cultures, relationships allowed for intra-relational thinking across entities and events, rather than inter-relational thinking merely between entities and events. It started to create tentative opening in which my campervan Butter, the covid-virus, hot tarmac, the seasons, vaccines, all became agents in the production of space, time, meaning and matter within my research, instead of the other way around. Slowly, I started to understand that any knowledge generated outside of the Cartesian cut, requires attunement to the agential forces of its relational web as you move through and alongside all the entities and events that are part of them. When the knowledge you seeks comes from such a relational paradigm, it are also all those relations that set the pace.

ICC's Protocol 6, that focusses on building meaningful relationships calls institutions, governments and individuals to "make a paradigm shift in their thinking, approaches, research, and decision- and policy-making". Among others, they call for "flexibility, adequate time, and recognition of seasonal calendars. (...) Throughout all processes, it is necessary to work with flexibility as Inuit lifestyle depends on the weather, the rhythm of animal movements and ultimately work within different seasonal calendars than many of the international fora."(ICC, 2022)

"Return" to Cut 1: Voices of Thunder, if you were seeking to collaborate with the Gjoa Haven HTA - but you got redirected by the Covid-19 pandemic.


Or,


"Return" to Cut 3: Wayfaring the Bearwatch project, if you were visiting Coral Harbour for the first time, when you got redirected by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Return to Cut 1

Return to Cut 3: Spring Coral Harbour 2020

  1. Aporta, C. (2004). Routes, trails and tracks: Trail breaking among the Inuit of Igloolik. Études/Inuit/Studies, 28(2), 9-38.