Experiment

Design notes for Camilo:

Structure of pages and links:

The Miro Board should help as a visual reference for the structure as laid out below.

Wikimedia pages and syntax:

Wikimedia Page= Cut/Track/Manuscript (generative action/physical manifestation/Academic format)

A page is a run-on, linear narrative track that cuts along KLS, and together shapes an academic "manuscript". They have a point of beginning, and they end at another point of beginning

Sometimes a narrative cut/track splits off in multiple different branches. In this case the page end with the heading after which narrative track branches out. Links are offered to multiple "new" points of beginning, under this last heading. This happens for example in cut2; 3. Aesthetic (in)action in BearWatch, which splits of into 2 "new" places of beginning (and also has a "hidden" third "new" place of beginning).

Different linking logics and syntax:

Miro design:

Process Notes for round 5:

Letting yourself be lead from the trajectory, the detours, allow for opportunities to for example engagae, inspire, create, spend time. See "Spending time vista"

Perhaps Round 5 could be a discussion of the different vista's that have emerged?

Process documentation:

05-11-2024

collage vista's and landmarks?

30-10-2024

Ask Camilo to install https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cite this is for Voices of Thunder#Response-ability

Also discuss how and where to put the references (each header?) AND at the end of each thread?

28-10-2024

Start thinking of visual language. I want a partial on-the-ground perspective with a horizon that indicates landmarks and vista's that help navigating, not a god's eye perspective. Could I generate a 3D model with Echo of my miro board? and then render and sketch out the horizon? for each heading? Or will I sketch different landmarks as they emerge when following the cut. Or both?

Start adding reference pictures here.

27-10-2024

Politics of recognition is an example of unresolvable tension, without any right way of doing things. In Invivo- I have marked these as "staying with the trouble" - They should pop-up as a category, at certain points of each cut. Like the other "vista's". They are added as bold in-text page links

I have started to think of categories for these "pop-ups": External influence/agential apparatus of PB monitoring, conservation, natural science etc./pressure ridges - Emergent insights/landmarks - Imaginaries that can function as buoys/vista's.

Navigation levels are now as follows I think (see Miro graph visualization):

Run-of-the page = cut (solid line) - doesn't avoid certain agential pressure ridges see below like covid or arctic travel.

In text links = are non-linear options/ reader agency to (re)turn to other cuts (striped line)

Bold in text links bottom of heading =

Either Green and purple post-its wayfaring invitations, to respond - or to be re-directed by agential pressure ridges (marked in miro by dotted line)

Or Vista's and landmarks = suggested "pop-ups" only when reader hits certain post-its. (those are the emergent insights around the ESE).

25-10-2024

The Wayfaring thread is a linear cut, it follows the BW project process. I add headers on level 4 and 5:

level 4

is response-ability/choices/ethical considerations

level 5

is External material agencies / pressure ridges

Not sure what to do with Politics of recognition yet - how it is connected to wayfaring (see 27-10 for further thought).

24-10-2024

Maybe wayfaring thread cut is indeed not linear, but has a point of beginning and weaves throughout the 2 other cuts. -Wayfaring is the process. -The ESE are the in-between spaces that emerge while wayfaring. These spaces are their own pages? Like the vista's suggested below? -The 2 cuts are the practices

15-10-2024

What if the vista's / landmarks emerge on the "horizon", when one hits certain "sidequests?"

14-10-2024

The narrative can't be the manuscript. because it is a knowledge product. The manuscript is then the decisions I made, and the process of an emergent project. So the encounters and the choices that each connect, or lay out a certain path. For example you can go straight from the workshops page to the output if you want - skipping the problematizing of "description".

Maybe each encounter (page, or subheading) is an ethical space of engagement, were different interests come together? This means that the previous decisions made (like the workshops in 2019 in my case), lead to the current encounter.

11-10-2024:

Cut 1: The page runs as the voices of thunder narrative (written out)

Place of beginning as an introduction of this thread, explaining what the thread is about, and in what way you as a reader/ researcher are invited to respond.

The cut is threaded with other intra-acting aesthetic actions like the workshop in 2019, the conference calls, the paper, the film, the website, which are each (running) pages themselves

06-10-2024:

Practice: aesthetic action (this is what I/we did - the paths of the map).

Space: corresponding ethics of willingness and boundaries (These are the different corresponding agential forces, e.g. refusal, care, curiosity).

Process: Wayfaring in the apparatus (this is the directional force - exerted by reader).

The logic I am trying out first is adding whole Manuscripts/cuts (aesthetic action) in 1 page and then adding its corresponding forces through links.

Here my H2

My text can go here. Well or not Well-written is just part of the process.

Here. i

am. camilo

there. me

bee

create. this

type of content

Template:CURRENTPAGE 21:46 Template:CURRENTUSER 354

Path 1

This is an Audio test

Subpath

This is my youtube video experiment: