Multiple Voices

Despite the disruptions of Covid-19, we were able to set a course to center Gjoa Haven's Voices of Thunder through academic scholarship, multiple co-created audio/visual outputs, and one-pager communications.

We also navigated the position of the academic scientists when ‘telling’ these stories of quota reduction impacts. Our conversations included discussions on the challenge of presenting Gjoa Haven’s voices and objectives, without the academic partners speaking for the community. We explored how exactly each of our voices could be appropriately leveraged within different knowledge products, including our academic publication.

For example, in the motion graphic documentary, the experiences shared by the workshop participants speak through the voices of Gjoa Haven community members themselves. In the academic paper, on the other hand, the BW scientists are more prominently present as they rethink their own assumptions, recognize the power-relationships between the “reader” and testimonial “text”, and challenge the comfortable concept of being a ‘distant’ other through a "testimonial reading" (Boler, 1997).

You pass a Landmark insight: “multiple sites of enunciation”. Take a closer look at this landmark, to see how it matters that different voices at play have positioned themselves differently in each form of output? Alternatively, you can keep going and learn more about “testimonial reading”

Landmark: Multiple Sites of Enunciation

Testimonial Reading

Terms like ‘testimony’ or ‘witnessing’ are ideologically and politically loaded. They furthermore may mean different things within different contexts. To ‘witness’, when considered in the context of this cross-cultural research collaboration, doesn’t take up the western legal definition of being an (eye)witness as it would in the context of a legal court. It rather takes up meaning that aligns more with the ways in which it was applied in the public fora of Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Committee hearings. This form of witnessing is active. It is not merely listening, nor is a one-time event.

In the case of our research we follow Megan Boler’s (1997) suggestions for readers or listeners to accept testimony by considering themselves as implicated with the events one accepts testimony for. ‘’…one must recognize oneself as implicated in the social forces that create the climate of obstacles the other must confront’’ (ibid, p. 257).

This approach aligns with some of the guiding principles for reconciliation as put forward by the TRC (TRC, 2015 p. 113). These principles propose an ‘awareness of the past, acknowledgement of the harm that has been inflicted, atonement for the causes, and action to change behaviour’ (ibid). In other words ‘The TRC (...) puts responsibility for change squarely on the shoulders of all Canadians’ (McGregor, 2018 p.823 emphasis mine)- not just the Indigenous people who take up responsibility for sharing their experiences publicly.

Voices of Thunder Testimonies

This cut will continue to trace the knowledge outputs that have emerged from the ongoing conversations between the Gjoa Haven HTA representatives and BW scientists. The outputs consist of, i) Voices of Thunder; an animated motion graphic documentary, ii) Winds of Change; webpage, and iii) Voices of Thunder; an interactive slideshow.

Audiences are invited to engage with these outputs to the degree that feels fitting with their own positionalities. Scientists that practice community-based wildlife monitoring in the Canadian Arctic will likely find some familiarities across their own research contexts and the reflection that the Bearwatch researchers speak to in their testimonial reading. Others, on the other hand, may not have much to gain by conducting a testimonial reading alongside non-Inuit researchers, and would perhaps prefer to only engage with Gjoa Haven’s testimonies directly, by watching the animated graphic documentary and timeline, or exploring the "Winds of Change" website.

Before you continue on your way, you look around in all directions to see whether you are still going into your desired direction. Looking back, you see two tracks. Down the track of cut 1, you can just about (still) see a landmark: Multiple sites of enunciation. Although you can’t really engage with it from here, it reminds you as you keep going that everyone has different places of beginnings, and therefore might travel this path in multiple directions.

You also see a track that may lead you back to Cut 3. If you were redirected from this cut much earlier in your journey, this is your opportunity pick up your wayfaring of the BearWatch project.

Where will you go?

Return to Cut 3: Wayfaring the BearWatch project

Voices of Thunder Animated Graphic Documentary

Voices of Thunder Inuktitut Syllabics version

Voices of Thunder English version

The experiences that are shared in this documentary come from 28 different voices that are narrated as ‘we' in this documentary. The narration of these voices happens through the recorded voice of one speaker from the community, while the archival documentation that provides particularized institutional context is narrated by another speaker from the community. To provide transparency on the multitude that is embedded within this ‘we’, all the community members that contributed to this narrative are named at the end of the video.

There seem to be many tracks entangled with this Motion Graphic Documentary.

Moving forward, and following the Voices of Thunder, leads you to some of the other research outputs. However, you can also take multiple detours.

One brings you to the film’s synopsis and its poster as it was distributed within the film festival circuit.

Another detour set’s you on the track of cut 2: Aesthetic Action, which allows you move alongside the process of film-making within the community.

If you came here while doing fieldwork in Gjoa Haven, you can return to cut 3 here, as well.

The last option allows you, depend from where you arrived at this point, to learn more about why this film was made. It will bring you to the beginning of cut 1: Voices of Thunder.

Detour to Cut 1: Voices of Thunder "Synopsis"

Detour to Cut 2: Aesthetic Action

Return to Cut 3: Gjoa Haven fieldwork 2022

Detour to Cut 1: Voices of Thunder "Places of Beginning"

Winds of Change Webpage

The Gjoa Haven HTA board had expressed a desire to have its “Voices of Thunder, echo everywhere”. We responded to this desire by building a “Winds of Change” webpage, in addition to the motion graphic animation. The webpage functions as an online advocacy tool and repository for Gjoa Haven’s “Voices of Thunder”, as it also gathers much of the other collected material related to Gjoa Haven’s experiences around polar bears.

The voice on this webpage represents a political appeal for recognition as put forward by the HTA board in 2022. It is published in 3 versions: English and Inuktitut, including a Syllabics version.

Voices of Thunder Interactive Slideshow

During the co-production of the animated graphic documentary, it became clear that in addition to an academic publication, webpage and video production, a third way of presenting the experiences as shared by Gjoa Haven’s community members, might be desirable. A document that would provide all the same information, arts and experiences that were shared in the animated graphic documentary- but could also afford for a more responsive way of interacting with Gjoa Haven’s testimonies. A supplemental form of output to the video and webpage, was created in the form of interactive slides, available in three versions; English, Inuktitut, and Inuktitut syllabics. It was added to the Winds of Change webpage.

English Version Slideshow

Inuktitut Version Slideshow

Inuktitut Syllabics Version Slideshow

You have now been presented with all the audio-visual outputs that were co-created with the community-members. Depending on where you place yourself within the larger dynamics of Truth and Reconciliation you may choose to keep going and follow alongside the BearWatch researchers in conducting a testimonial reading. Alternatively, you can take a take a short-cut to the current cusp of emergence, and jump straight to the ongoing developments around the Voices of Thunder as they keep unfolding.

If you just came here from Cut 2: Aesthetic Action, to view the "Voices of Thunder" audio-visual outputs, you can also find your way back to your original cut here.

Detour to Cut 1: The Cusp of Emergence

Return to Cut 2: Aesthetic Action

Voices of Thunder Testimonial Reading

You have decided to follow alongside a group of non-Indigenous researchers of the Bearwatch project as they, i) acknowledge their initial affective responses towards selected testimonies, ii) explore how they may be implicated with the experiences shared by Gjoa Haven community members, and iii) as they make themselves accountable, as part of a research legacy that has neglected to properly recognize and engage with these experiences before.

The recorded process of this testimonial reading is explicitly written from the perspective of several academic scientists of the BearWatch project, in particular that of me and three of the BW Principal Investigators actively involved with the community-based fieldwork in Gjoa Haven.

Affective Responses

To transcend passive empathy as non-Indigenous researchers, in the context of the settler-Indigenous reconciliation, we must explore self-implication and our potentials for taking reconciliatory action- while also acknowledging our affective responses (including those of guilt and unsettlement). Such acknowledgements allow for our affective responses to assist us in our processes of reconciliation, rather than hold us back.

What are your first affective responses to such commentaries on research? As part of your journey alongside our testimonial reading, you can start by writing down your initial emotional respons(es) to such concerns and critiques around research. Don’t worry- it is just for yourself. However, if you want. You are invited to trail off to find out what our responses were, and share yours.

Invitation: Dwell on Vulnerability in Research

Implication

Part of conducting a testimonial reading is to consider oneself as implicated within the larger structures ‘that create the climate of obstacles the other must confront’ (Boler, 1997, p. 257). This “climate” is what Karen Barad refers to as the agential ‘apparatus” (Barad, 2007 p.). And what Rothberg understands as emerging from collectives, like for example the academic institute or the settler-state, to which one subscribes and in turn becomes implicated with (Rothberg, 2019).

Researchers of the Bearwatch project were initially hesitant to enter this conversation. The topic of quota setting was considered as outside of their sphere of influence, and scope of scientific research objectives. This testimonial reading made it possible to acknowledge and recognize our responsibility towards our research partners to listen and engage with their needs and priorities. Following Rothberg, we are not by default guilty of the lack of accountability displayed by previous research partners in Gjoa Haven - but we do carry a responsibility to acknowledge and address the structures and institutes that have made, and continue to make it possible for researchers to avoid accountability and ignore community priorities.

You can keep going with this testimonial reading. Or you can explore another wrecksite nearby. This wrecksite: "Polar Bear Monitoring and Management will likely help you, like it helped us, understand how the BearWatch project is entanglement within the larger apparatuses of polar bear harvest quota setting.

Wrecksite: Nunavut Polar Bear Monitoring and Management

Response-ability

A ‘testimonial reading involves empathy, but requires the reader's responsibility’ (Boler (1997 p. 256, emphasis mine). To be responsible, is to have the ability to respond. Rothberg invokes an implicated subject that assumes responsibility based on collective legacy, but that also has individual agency in terms of resisting or contributing to contemporary structures of injustice. ‘One has responsibility always now’ (Young, 2010).

As academic, non-government researchers engaged with the community of Gjoa Haven, we may not hold the ability to respond to all of the concerns that were expressed by our research partners. But we do have the ability to engage with need for broader recognition of Inuit knowledge in the form of better integration of Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit in polar bear research and management by critically exploring our own practices when it comes to knowledge conciliation.

How do you respond? Continue to engage with questions of such accountability. Or take detour to find out more about how the Bearwatch researchers engaged with Inuit Knowledge during the research project.

Detour: Knowledge Co-production in BearWatch

Relational Accountability

Within Indigenous (research) paradigms of collective responsibility, and intra-dependency- accountability is often quite literally understood in terms of recognizing one’s responsibilities and making oneself accountable to ones more-than-human relations (Wilson, 2008; McGregor, 2009; Kovach, 2021). Traditional understandings of accountability within western academia as the occasional ‘presenting back’ final outcomes of research to partnering communities, come across as distant and disengaged in comparison.

This quote speaks to an expectation, from Gjoa Haven hunters who were present at our workshops, that researchers take responsibility for the social implications of research results that do not translate into preferable outcomes for the communities per se. In the case of Gjoa Haven, many community members expressed feeling like they had to fend for themselves after the considerable cut in polar bear quota. And that the support they were promised, was never delivered.

Look again at the Voices of Thunder slideshow. Take your time, and let each of the testimonies sink in. An emergent insight shapes as you sit at your table. You understand that you are addressed and asked to carefully take note of what is being shared. Surrender to your track of thoughts and pay attention to this landmark moment. Or finish the testimonial reading and take stock of this story-so-far.

Landmark: Listening and Witnessing

Another Point of Beginning

You have reached "Another Point of Beginning". These are not conclusive endings to my research, but rather perform at the cusp of emergence: They are a story so-far. Some of these points mark the end of funding cycles or project activities. Or they mark the limitations and scope of this particular PhD dissertation. Others are trails, and tracks that have faded out, as they remained un-revisited. They however always mark one moment along an ongoing animate line of correspondence between multiple agencies, and they usually allow for continuing with another cut.

This is where we take account for our journey so far. This journey is always partial, and so are the insights we have built on our way. You can trace the path you have taken through this Knowledge-Land-Scape by clicking the "trace" bar in the upper left corner of your screen. It will allow you to account for some of the insights that your journey has given you. The map below shows you the full extent of wayfaring possibilities of the scape.

Cut 1 has taken you along the journey of what originally would have been an academic representation of Gjoa Haven’s experiences of the impacts of significant quota reductions, and evolved into a co-creative process of accepting testimony between Gjoa Haven community members and academic researchers of the BearWatch project.

By choosing to engage with the ongoing conversations and collaborative processes of different research outputs creations, you have been able to respond to the desire for recognition as expressed by several Gjoa Haven HTA representatives in different ways. Not only has this allowed you the possibility of attentively listening to Gjoa Haven community member's experiences, it has also given you insights on how creative practice may itself provide a guiding cut towards ethical attunement. The creative practices and processes of this cut have required us to make choices along the way. Each choice allows us to feel our way along the possibilities and boundaries of ethical engagement in a third space. Whether this is by exploring our own positions and voices in sharing Gjoa Haven's testimonies, or by "staying with the trouble" when we run into the "Great White Beasts" of unresolve-able tensions. Keep going to explore how the different research output creations have continued their material agencies beyond this cut.

Beyond the Cut

The “Voices of Thunder” Animated Graphic Documentary has been screened multiple times in Gjoa Haven, and shared on the Gjoa Haven community Facebook page, with the explicit call to share the movie and show it to friends and family within and outside of Gjoa Haven. It was also screened at several academic conferences related to the (Canadian) Arctic and wildlife management. Among them was a plenary screening at the Annual Science Meeting of ArcticNet in Toronto, 2022, and it was screened as an opening movie during Critical Arctic Studies conference in Rovaniemi, 2023. We furthermore circulated the movie in the film festival circuit, where it got accepted and screened at several relevant festivals like; Society for Visual Anthropology Film and Media Festival (SVAFMF) in Toronto, 2023, Aulajut: Nunavut International Film Festival in Iqaluit, 2023, Dawson City International Short Film Festival in Dawson, 2024 and the Available Light Film Festival in Yukon, 2024. Finally, it was taken up in the online collection of imagineNATIVE Film + Media Arts Festival in 2023.

The film was not only disseminated by BearWatch researchers. The HTA screened the movie at a regional meeting during which the HTA’s of Gjoa Haven, Taloyoak and Cambridge Bay met with the Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board. The film was received with praise from the regional board and the other two communities. A Member of the Legislative Assembly, who resides in Gjoa Haven, leveraged the film, together with the “Winds of Change” website in a letter to the Minister of Environment to call attention to Gjoa Haven testimonies and request ‘a detailed update’ on the ‘department’s work with the Gjoa Haven Hunters and Trappers Association to manage this subpopulation’.

As for this cut and its testimonial reading, we invite audience members to engage with Gjoa Haven appeals in ways that feel appropriate to ones reconciliatory responsibilities. We nevertheless hope to inspire our academic audience(s), especially those researching wildlife in Nunavut (and beyond), to recognize themselves as structurally implicated in the structures that have contributed to the experiences to which the testimonies in this manuscript speak, and explore how such structures manifest in their own research context.

Our article, Voices of Thunder: Polar Bear Quota Reduction Impacts in Gjoa Haven, Nunavut - From Purveying Voices to Accepting Testimony, was submitted for peer review at the Arctic Science Journal in January 2025.

Corresponding cuts 2 and 3, provide additional insights on how (creative) practices, like the ones shared in this cut, may come to matter as ethical spaces of engagement and how they may open possibilities for ethical knowledge conciliation on the way.

Detour to Cut 2: Aesthetic Action point of Beginning

Detour to Cut 3: Wayfaring the BW project Point of Beginning