Ethics of Response-Ability: Difference between revisions

From Knowledge-land-scape
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
Neither option is “innocent.” There are no "easy ways out".  
Neither option is “innocent.” There are no "easy ways out".  


<div class="next_choice">In dealing with this Great White Beast, I have chosen to rely on a very selective body of western scholarship.
<div class="next_choice">In dealing with this Great White Beast, I have chosen to put a very selective body of western scholarship in dialogue with Indigenous principles of ethical engagement.


I draw from this scholarship to formulate ways of thinking outside of the classic western subject/object divides, while not appropriating Indigenous paradigms.
I do this to formulate ways of thinking outside of the classic western subject/object divides, while not appropriating Indigenous paradigms.  
 
Where appropriate, I have placed my journey in dialogue with Indigenous scholarship.


'''"Return"''' to cut 3 to start tracing the Bearwatch project. </div>
'''"Return"''' to cut 3 to start tracing the Bearwatch project. </div>


<span class="return to-cut-3 link" data-page-title="Wayfaring the BearWatch Project" data-section-id="8" data-encounter-type="return">[[Wayfaring the BearWatch Project#TEK Workshops|Return to Cut 3: Wayfaring the BearWatch Project]]</span>
<span class="return to-cut-3 link" data-page-title="Wayfaring the BearWatch Project" data-section-id="8" data-encounter-type="return">[[Wayfaring the BearWatch Project#TEK Workshops|Return to Cut 3: Wayfaring the BearWatch Project]]</span>

Revision as of 10:11, 27 February 2025

You have encountered a “Great White Beast”, a fleeting, shapeshifting figure that performs the world as indeterminate.

The ethics involved when it comes to drawing from research paradigms that consider the world as indeterminate, intra-dependent and ontologically generative, cannot be resolved through ‘right’ ways of doing things.

Non-Indigenous researchers engaging any form of generative ontologies need to take responsibility for whichever option they choose:


1. engaging Indigenous scholarship, or

2. not engaging Indigenous scholarship.


Neither option is “innocent.” There are no "easy ways out".

In dealing with this Great White Beast, I have chosen to put a very selective body of western scholarship in dialogue with Indigenous principles of ethical engagement.

I do this to formulate ways of thinking outside of the classic western subject/object divides, while not appropriating Indigenous paradigms.

"Return" to cut 3 to start tracing the Bearwatch project.

Return to Cut 3: Wayfaring the BearWatch Project