Ethics of Response-Ability: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
You have encountered a “Great White Beast”, a fleeting, shapeshifting figure that performs the world as indeterminate. | You have encountered a “Great White Beast”, a fleeting, shapeshifting figure that performs the world as indeterminate. | ||
The ethics involved when it comes to drawing from research paradigms that consider the world as indeterminate, intra-dependent and ontologically generative, cannot be resolved through ‘right’ ways of doing things. | |||
Non-Indigenous researchers engaging any form of generative ontologies need to take responsibility for whichever option they choose: | |||
1. engaging Indigenous scholarship, or | 1. engaging Indigenous scholarship, or | ||
| Line 13: | Line 11: | ||
2. not engaging Indigenous scholarship | 2. not engaging Indigenous scholarship | ||
Neither option is “innocent.” There are no "easy ways out". | |||
<div class="next_choice"> | |||
In dealing with this Great White Beast, I have chosen to rely on a very selective body of western scholarship to formulate ways of thinking outside of the classic western subject/object divide and not appropriate Indigenous scholarship in formulating my own understanding of ontologically generative paradigms. | In dealing with this Great White Beast, I have chosen to rely on a very selective body of western scholarship to formulate ways of thinking outside of the classic western subject/object divide and not appropriate Indigenous scholarship in formulating my own understanding of ontologically generative paradigms. | ||
Where appropriate, I have placed my journey in dialogue with Indigenous scholarship. | Where appropriate, I have placed my journey in dialogue with Indigenous scholarship. | ||
'''"Return"''' to cut 3 to start tracing the Bearwatch project. </div> | |||
<span class="return to-cut-3 link" data-page-title="Wayfaring the BearWatch Project" data-section-id="8" data-encounter-type="return">[[Wayfaring the BearWatch Project#TEK Workshops|Return to Cut 3: Wayfaring the BearWatch Project]]</span> | <span class="return to-cut-3 link" data-page-title="Wayfaring the BearWatch Project" data-section-id="8" data-encounter-type="return">[[Wayfaring the BearWatch Project#TEK Workshops|Return to Cut 3: Wayfaring the BearWatch Project]]</span> | ||
Revision as of 10:06, 27 February 2025
You have encountered a “Great White Beast”, a fleeting, shapeshifting figure that performs the world as indeterminate.
The ethics involved when it comes to drawing from research paradigms that consider the world as indeterminate, intra-dependent and ontologically generative, cannot be resolved through ‘right’ ways of doing things.
Non-Indigenous researchers engaging any form of generative ontologies need to take responsibility for whichever option they choose:
1. engaging Indigenous scholarship, or
2. not engaging Indigenous scholarship
Neither option is “innocent.” There are no "easy ways out".
In dealing with this Great White Beast, I have chosen to rely on a very selective body of western scholarship to formulate ways of thinking outside of the classic western subject/object divide and not appropriate Indigenous scholarship in formulating my own understanding of ontologically generative paradigms.
Where appropriate, I have placed my journey in dialogue with Indigenous scholarship.
"Return" to cut 3 to start tracing the Bearwatch project.