Wayfaring the BearWatch Project

Estimated time to follow this cut without detours: 20 minutes (excluding 20 minutes animated graphic documentary.)

The land invites one to move away from anthropocentric tellings - towards narrations of becoming knowledgeable in company with the seasons, snow, ice, wind, lichens, caribou and many more. Such stories leave room for us as researchers, but aren’t about us.

Spring in Coral Harbour (Photograph taken by author in 2021)

Acknowledgements

An explicit note of acknowledgement for this cut goes out in particular to George Konana, in Gjoa Haven, and Leonard Netser in Coral Harbour.

Both men have taken me out on the land, the sea and the ice on multiple occasions between 2020-2023. They patiently took time to introduce me to their land and explained how they found their way in various ways and under multiple conditions.

Although they graciously responded to my many questions, I am most grateful to their valuable lessons of guiding me to tag along and just be present for the ride.

Leonard Netser (left) and George Konana (right) photographed by author

Becoming a Wayfarer

My name is Saskia de Wildt. This cut traces the processes of my PhD research as part of a large Genome Canada funded research project called BearWatch.

I ask the question of what it means to practice knowledge conciliation under guidance of the principles of the ‘Ethical Space of Engagement’ and the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) Protocols for Equitable and Ethical Engagement (EEE) rather than based on data-driven needs.

To engage with such a sensitizing research question entails making multiple shifts.

A shift of positioning; from distanced observer or reader to becoming an entangled “subject” – and a shift from operating based on fixed principles, to a practice of ongoing negotiations and ethical encounter.

As you make your way through this knowledge-land-scape, depending on the choices you make, you might start feeling these shifts yourself. Transforming from being a reader of my research, towards becoming a wayfarer alongside my research.

Knowledge Conciliation in Polar Bear Research

The polar bear co-management regime in the Nunavut Settlement Area, is based on the 1993 Nunavut Land Claim Agreement (NLCA), that states that “Inuit must always take part in decisions on wildlife”, while “the guiding principles and concepts of Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (IQ) are to be described and made an integral part of the management of wildlife and habitat.”

Despite such formalized co-management, tensions remain. Data-driven conservation, management and monitoring of polar bears in Inuit Nunangat- while necessary to address significant data gaps on population trends and a rapidly changing Arctic environment- has also proven itself a challenging environment for the conciliation of different ways of knowing and being.

This cut explores the methodology of wayfaring as an ethical practice of knowledge conciliation.

Wayfaring as a Sensitizing Method

My wayfaring approach, as will become clear, does not attempt to formulate a new, alternative, or innovative means of knowledge conciliation across cultural differences, nor does it lead to conclusive take-aways about ethical knowledge conciliation.

It instead unsettles fixed ideas about “knowledge” towards a “coming to know”, and instead of “knowledge integration” it performs the idea of “worldly encounters”.

Two polar bear skulls at George Konana's cabin.

This cut centers the unfolding of a particular research project: ‘Bearwatch: Monitoring Impacts of Arctic Climate Change using Polar Bears, Genomics and Traditional Ecological Knowledge’ – hereafter referred to as ‘Bearwatch’.

Excerpts of project reports serve as a guiding cut, while you, I, and multiple others may thread our own corresponding paths alongside it.

"Keep going" to learn more

The BearWatch Project

The BearWatch project ran between 2015 and 2023, during which it sought to meaningfully engage IQ in its development of a new non-invasive genomic polar bear monitoring toolkit.

Most researchers and policymakers in the field of polar bear science more generally – and on the BearWatch project particularly – are trained in a variety of natural science disciplines of the western academic institute, or they are Inuit knowledge and rights holders.

I, myself, am a white, queer, settler-guest researcher from the Netherlands with a background in the applied arts and social sciences, which has required me to negotiate and navigate my own way of meaning making alongside many of the project’s activities.

But before you keep going, notice that you have stumbled upon a "Vista". This "Vista" is a viewpoint. Go check it out!

Vista: The ESE

Decision-making

You now have a choice to make.

Will you trace the most straightforward path across the BearWatch project, engaging mostly with the project reports of BearWatch? Or will you start threading your own intra-dependent way alongside the project and me?

If you have not yet checked out the "Terms of Engagement" of this knowledge-land-scape, you should seek them out - find them on the bottom right corner of your screen.

Otherwise,

Take a "Detour" to look up the meaning of “intra” dependency, as opposed to “interdependency” before you keep going.

Or,

"Keep going" to keep following this cut instead.

Detour: look up the meaning of "intra-dependency"

TEK Workshops

You jump straight into the BearWatch project- beginning with the TEK workshops that were held in the community of Gjoa Haven in 2019 as to inform a feasibility study on future community-driven polar bear fecal sample collection.

The BearWatch project was designed to include a “Genomics and its Environmental, Economic, Ethical, Legal and Social aspects (GE3LS)” component (BearWatch research proposal, 2016 p.30-31).

Three TEK mapping workshops were co-designed with the HTA of Gjoa Haven, as part of this GE3Ls strategy to ‘identify TEK gaps’ and ‘fill them’.

Participants discussing during BearWatch TEK workshop 2019

There is also another kind of workshop lined up:

The Gjoa Haven Gjoa Haven Hunters and Trappers Association has urgently been trying to get the BearWatch researchers to turn their focus towards the available polar bear harvest quota. After two generations of hardly being able to hunt polar bears, the Gjoa Haven HTA have asked the researchers of the BearWatch project to help them seek recognition for the loss of income, loss of culture, and loss of intergenerational knowledge transfer.

You have taken a moment to sit down and read what Genome Canada has written on their website about GE3LS, as someone brings up the existence of a nearby shipwreck: "Knowledge Co-production”.

They suggest you go check it out to get a deeper understanding of the im/possibilities around bringing IQ together with western sciences.

You weigh your options,

"Detour", to read about GE3LS.

Or,

"Keep going" to attend these impacts workshop.

Or,

First, go check out the "Wrecksite" of "Knowledge Co-production"

Detour: Read more about GE3Ls

Wrecksite: Knowledge Co-production

Workshops Summer 2019

Participants discussing during BearWatch TEK workshop 2019

Two workshops were organized in response to community requests, to record the impacts of polar bear hunting quota reductions on the community.

One workshop was held May 15, 2019 in the evening with 10 participants and one on May 16 in the morning with 11 participants.

Both workshops were audio-recorded.

The BearWatch PI's and Gjoa Haven HTA-board want to use these recordings as primary materials for an academic paper.

They ask me to write it.

I have just learnt about this project and have not yet set foot into the community. Although I understand that writing “about” other people’s experiences doesn’t exactly sound ethical, the Gjoa Haven HTA wants a publication, so maybe there is no need to complicate things further?

What would you do?

"Stay with the Trouble" and explore what is possible, while also keeping in mind how the “Politics of recognition” can complicate such writing practices.

Or,

Choose to not engage further with the community of Gjoa Haven for now.

"Keep going" to trace Cut 3: the unfolding of the BearWatch project, and prepare for your first fieldtrip to Coral Harbour.

Stay with the trouble: The Politics of Recognition

Coral Harbour First Trip 2020

Alongside funding from Genome Canada, the project PI’s also successfully applied to the Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada/ World Wildlife Fund to fund ‘traditional knowledge research and a denning survey in Coral Harbour, Nunavut’ (Schedule H, 2020, March 31. This intended study included documenting polar bear TEK in Coral Harbour, surveys of vacated dens by locals to collect a variety of samples and data, and the initiation of a collaborative effort with the high school to train students in land-based surveys.

However, before you start, you hit an "Ice-Pressure Ridge". The Covid virus has so rapidly spread, the World Health Organization declared it a pandemic on March 20, 2020.

Ice-pressure ridge: Immediately book a flight back