Multiple Sites of Enunciation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Landmark.png|thumb]] | [[File:Landmark.png|thumb]] | ||
The landmark, as a figure, has itself lots to teach us about how to acknowledge and relate to | The landmark, as a figure, has itself lots to teach us about how to acknowledge and relate to the tension of our differences, when it comes to our entanglements within the overarching polar bear management and monitoring apparatuses | ||
The point here is not to argue whether or not we are looking at the same rock formation, or how our subjective views change the way that the rock present themselves to us. | The point here is not to argue whether or not we are looking at the same rock formation, or how our subjective views change the way that the rock present themselves to us. |
Revision as of 23:47, 25 February 2025

The landmark, as a figure, has itself lots to teach us about how to acknowledge and relate to the tension of our differences, when it comes to our entanglements within the overarching polar bear management and monitoring apparatuses
The point here is not to argue whether or not we are looking at the same rock formation, or how our subjective views change the way that the rock present themselves to us.
The point here is that the rocks are not determinable as separate from ourselves, our position in the landscape, where we have been and where we are going. Our practice of lateral movement has unfixed the rocks as not just something than can be located out there, but rather as something that can also locate us, and the many other other material agencies that make it possible for us to encounter the rock formation.