Gaps, Openings and Possibilities: Difference between revisions

From Knowledge-land-scape
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Loss of control. leaves room to fill in.
[[File:Landmark.png|thumb]]


Also acknowledging gaps in knowledge or expertise, provided space to initiate ongoing dialogue.
Gaps are not just failures but openings where new possibilities emerge. In Barad’s agential realism, events unfold through entanglements, not fixed plans. When things don’t happen as expected, these ruptures disrupt control but also create space for new ways of knowing and relating. This is crucial precisely because we don’t know what we don’t know—unanticipated gaps reveal possibilities beyond our initial frameworks, allowing knowledge and collaboration to be reconfigured in ways we couldn’t have predicted.


<span class="return link" data-page-title="Preparation Gjoa Haven Workshop" data-section-id="6" data-encounter-type="return">[[Preparation Gjoa Haven Workshop#Scientific Presentations|Cut 2: Gjoa Haven Workshop]]</span>
<span class="return link" data-page-title="Preparation Gjoa Haven Workshop" data-section-id="6" data-encounter-type="return">[[Preparation Gjoa Haven Workshop#Scientific Presentations|Return to Cut 2: Gjoa Haven Workshop]]</span>

Revision as of 22:11, 2 March 2025

Gaps are not just failures but openings where new possibilities emerge. In Barad’s agential realism, events unfold through entanglements, not fixed plans. When things don’t happen as expected, these ruptures disrupt control but also create space for new ways of knowing and relating. This is crucial precisely because we don’t know what we don’t know—unanticipated gaps reveal possibilities beyond our initial frameworks, allowing knowledge and collaboration to be reconfigured in ways we couldn’t have predicted.

Return to Cut 2: Gjoa Haven Workshop