Instructions: Ways to Navigate this Space: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
As you enter this knowledge-land-scape you take up the role of a | As you enter this knowledge-land-scape you take up the fictional role of a community-based researcher that tries to make their way through an existing large polar bear monitoring project while seeking to answer the following question; “What does it mean to practice knowledge conciliation guided by the principles of the ethical space of engagement, rather than by data-driven needs?” | ||
You don’t have to answer this question by yourself, however. As you proceed, you will be making decisions in correspondence with me, the author of this knowledge-land-scape. As my research practices and experiences, as part of the BearWatch project, unfold as auto-ethnographic narratives, you may trace them as guiding cuts across this knowledge-land-scape towards making sense of ethical engagement in community-based research, together with me. | |||
<span class="next_choice"> | You can follow the cuts that I have made through the knowledge-land-scape. You can however also, and are explicitly invited to, divert from these cuts and take any opportunity to navigate knowledge-land-scape as you please. As you will make your way along my research processes, you will find that you are moving alongside and across the traces of multiple others that have come before you and me. As I did, you will encounter various of those agencies along your way, and you will have to make your own decisions on how you want to proceed across this knowledge-land-scape. Will you allow yourself to be a responsive researcher, with the risk of getting diverted from your original path? Or will you stay on course and seek to make sense of ethical engagement in community-based research as efficiently as possible? | ||
<span class="next_choice"> You have scrolled down to find an easy answer. However, in this case it seems there are none. It looks like you have to make choices without fully understanding the extent of their impacts, while being responsible for your choices regardless. You’ll have to trust that you will gain more insights as you go, and make your choices carefully. In this case, luckily, it seems like you can only "keep going". Click the "Keep Going" button to your right to finish the rest of this short “wayfaring tutorial”. | |||
</span> | |||
Line 9: | Line 13: | ||
=Cuts, Threads and Trails= | =Cuts, Threads and Trails= | ||
This space provides three available storylines that "cut" across the knowledge-land-scape. Each cut corresponds to what conventionally would be referred to as a PhD dissertation manuscript: i) “Voices of Thunder”, ii) ‘Aesthetic Action”, and iii) “Wayfaring the BW project”. You may enter the Knowledge-Land-Scape by making a choice between one of the three cuts. Once you have chosen a cut, follow the “keep going” prompt on the right side of your screen, to keep tracing that storyline. To keep following a particular cut is to trace | This space provides three available storylines that "cut" across the knowledge-land-scape. Each cut corresponds to what conventionally would be referred to as a PhD dissertation manuscript: i) “Voices of Thunder”, ii) ‘Aesthetic Action”, and iii) “Wayfaring the BW project”. You may enter the Knowledge-Land-Scape by making a choice between one of the three cuts. Once you have chosen a cut, follow the “keep going” prompt on the right side of your screen, to keep tracing that storyline. To keep following a particular cut is to trace my research across the scape in the most-straight-forward manner, to eventually arrive at “another point of beginning” where I account for its “story-so-far” . A story-so-far may include more classic research outputs, like published papers or it may explain how the open-ended nature of the cut allows for ongoing impacts or future possibilities. | ||
Apart from tracing cuts, it is also possible to thread your own way through the knowledge-land-scape. This becomes possible by responding to the many options to pivot, or detour from your initially chosen cut. You can start following another cut halfway your journey, or trail-off in response to an invitation you encounter on the way. You might even be pushed off course by unanticipated events or new insights. | Apart from tracing cuts, it is also possible to thread your own way through the storylines of the knowledge-land-scape. This becomes possible by responding to the many options to pivot, or detour from your initially chosen cut: a process I refer to as “wayfaring”. Although all possibilities in this knowledge-land-scape are based on my own recorded experiences, observations and research processes, it is the open-ended nature of this knowledge-land-scape that makes it possible for you to perform your own choices within this space. You can start following another cut halfway your journey, or trail-off in response to an invitation you encounter on the way. You might even be pushed off course by unanticipated events or new insights. Within this knowledge-land-scape I propose such redirectives as taking the shape of either “invitations” or “ice pressure ridges”. | ||
<span class="next_choice"> | |||
<span class="next_choice"> Keep going to learn about invitations and ice pressure ridges. </span> | |||
=Redirectives: Invitations= | =Redirectives: Invitations= | ||
As you make your way along the knowledge-land-scape, you will encounter different possibilities to trail-off. Some of these possibilities come in the form of various invitations, while others come in the shape of ice-pressure ridges. They both allow, in their own different ways for a responsive redirection | As you make your way along the knowledge-land-scape, you will encounter different possibilities to trail-off. Some of these possibilities come in the form of various invitations, while others come in the shape of ice-pressure ridges. They both allow, in their own different ways for a responsive redirection, away from your original course. Let’s start with learning about invitations. | ||
<span class="next_choice"> You are invited to learn about invitations. You can hover over the “invitation” button that has appeared in the left bottom corner to unveil more about this invitation. Note that you don’t have to accept this, or any other invitation. You can also “keep going” to stay on your current course. In this tutorial, however, it is important to check out the invitation. When you are ready to accept, click the | <span class="next_choice"> You are invited to learn about invitations. You can hover over the “invitation” button that has appeared in the left bottom corner to unveil more about this invitation. Note that you don’t have to accept this, or any other invitation in the knowledge-land-scape for that matter. You can also “keep going” to stay on your current course. | ||
In this tutorial, however, it is important to check out the invitation. When you are ready to accept, click the button. </span> | |||
<span class="redirective invitation link" data-page-title="Learning About Invitations" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="invitation">[[Learning About Invitations]]</span> | <span class="redirective invitation link" data-page-title="Learning About Invitations" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="invitation">[[Learning About Invitations]]</span> | ||
Line 26: | Line 33: | ||
=Redirectives: Ice Pressure Ridges= | =Redirectives: Ice Pressure Ridges= | ||
"Ice Pressure ridges" are the second redirective possibility to | "Ice Pressure ridges" are the second redirective possibility to pivot from your prior course. The ice pressure ridge is a figure that gestures towards the agencies of the land itself. They remind us that agency is not a property that is possessed by individual readers, researchers and authors. We always operate intra-dependently with many other agential forces, both human and non-human. Ice pressure ridges perform a redirective of a seemingly less voluntary nature than the invitations explained before. That is because an ice-pressure ridge does not so much perform a possibility, as it performs the conditions and boundaries within which the choices we make as researchers encounter the larger apparatuses at play. Ice pressure ridges de/marcate both the boundaries of this knowledge-land-scape, and the extent of possibilities for readers to make their own tracing/threading/wayfaring choices. Not everything is possible in community research, nor in this knowledge-land-scape. | ||
<span class="next_choice"> You have encountered an ice-pressure ridge. Note that in this case you can not “keep going”, you are forced to go off course. click the | <span class="next_choice"> You have encountered an ice-pressure ridge. Note that in this case you can not “keep going”, you are forced to go off course, and trail longside this ridge. click the “Ice Pressure Ridge” button when you are ready to learn more about ice pressure ridges. | ||
</span> | |||
<span class="redirective ice pressure ridge link" data-page-title="Learning About Ice Pressure Ridges" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="ice pressure ridge">[[Learning About Ice Pressure Ridges]]</span> | <span class="redirective ice pressure ridge link" data-page-title="Learning About Ice Pressure Ridges" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="ice pressure ridge">[[Learning About Ice Pressure Ridges]]</span> |
Revision as of 23:17, 2 January 2025
As you enter this knowledge-land-scape you take up the fictional role of a community-based researcher that tries to make their way through an existing large polar bear monitoring project while seeking to answer the following question; “What does it mean to practice knowledge conciliation guided by the principles of the ethical space of engagement, rather than by data-driven needs?”
You don’t have to answer this question by yourself, however. As you proceed, you will be making decisions in correspondence with me, the author of this knowledge-land-scape. As my research practices and experiences, as part of the BearWatch project, unfold as auto-ethnographic narratives, you may trace them as guiding cuts across this knowledge-land-scape towards making sense of ethical engagement in community-based research, together with me.
You can follow the cuts that I have made through the knowledge-land-scape. You can however also, and are explicitly invited to, divert from these cuts and take any opportunity to navigate knowledge-land-scape as you please. As you will make your way along my research processes, you will find that you are moving alongside and across the traces of multiple others that have come before you and me. As I did, you will encounter various of those agencies along your way, and you will have to make your own decisions on how you want to proceed across this knowledge-land-scape. Will you allow yourself to be a responsive researcher, with the risk of getting diverted from your original path? Or will you stay on course and seek to make sense of ethical engagement in community-based research as efficiently as possible?
You have scrolled down to find an easy answer. However, in this case it seems there are none. It looks like you have to make choices without fully understanding the extent of their impacts, while being responsible for your choices regardless. You’ll have to trust that you will gain more insights as you go, and make your choices carefully. In this case, luckily, it seems like you can only "keep going". Click the "Keep Going" button to your right to finish the rest of this short “wayfaring tutorial”.
Cuts, Threads and Trails
This space provides three available storylines that "cut" across the knowledge-land-scape. Each cut corresponds to what conventionally would be referred to as a PhD dissertation manuscript: i) “Voices of Thunder”, ii) ‘Aesthetic Action”, and iii) “Wayfaring the BW project”. You may enter the Knowledge-Land-Scape by making a choice between one of the three cuts. Once you have chosen a cut, follow the “keep going” prompt on the right side of your screen, to keep tracing that storyline. To keep following a particular cut is to trace my research across the scape in the most-straight-forward manner, to eventually arrive at “another point of beginning” where I account for its “story-so-far” . A story-so-far may include more classic research outputs, like published papers or it may explain how the open-ended nature of the cut allows for ongoing impacts or future possibilities.
Apart from tracing cuts, it is also possible to thread your own way through the storylines of the knowledge-land-scape. This becomes possible by responding to the many options to pivot, or detour from your initially chosen cut: a process I refer to as “wayfaring”. Although all possibilities in this knowledge-land-scape are based on my own recorded experiences, observations and research processes, it is the open-ended nature of this knowledge-land-scape that makes it possible for you to perform your own choices within this space. You can start following another cut halfway your journey, or trail-off in response to an invitation you encounter on the way. You might even be pushed off course by unanticipated events or new insights. Within this knowledge-land-scape I propose such redirectives as taking the shape of either “invitations” or “ice pressure ridges”.
Keep going to learn about invitations and ice pressure ridges.
Redirectives: Invitations
As you make your way along the knowledge-land-scape, you will encounter different possibilities to trail-off. Some of these possibilities come in the form of various invitations, while others come in the shape of ice-pressure ridges. They both allow, in their own different ways for a responsive redirection, away from your original course. Let’s start with learning about invitations.
You are invited to learn about invitations. You can hover over the “invitation” button that has appeared in the left bottom corner to unveil more about this invitation. Note that you don’t have to accept this, or any other invitation in the knowledge-land-scape for that matter. You can also “keep going” to stay on your current course.
In this tutorial, however, it is important to check out the invitation. When you are ready to accept, click the button.
Redirectives: Ice Pressure Ridges
"Ice Pressure ridges" are the second redirective possibility to pivot from your prior course. The ice pressure ridge is a figure that gestures towards the agencies of the land itself. They remind us that agency is not a property that is possessed by individual readers, researchers and authors. We always operate intra-dependently with many other agential forces, both human and non-human. Ice pressure ridges perform a redirective of a seemingly less voluntary nature than the invitations explained before. That is because an ice-pressure ridge does not so much perform a possibility, as it performs the conditions and boundaries within which the choices we make as researchers encounter the larger apparatuses at play. Ice pressure ridges de/marcate both the boundaries of this knowledge-land-scape, and the extent of possibilities for readers to make their own tracing/threading/wayfaring choices. Not everything is possible in community research, nor in this knowledge-land-scape.
You have encountered an ice-pressure ridge. Note that in this case you can not “keep going”, you are forced to go off course, and trail longside this ridge. click the “Ice Pressure Ridge” button when you are ready to learn more about ice pressure ridges.