Experiment

Process documentation:

14-10-2024

The narrative can't be the manuscript. because it is a knowledge product. The manuscript is then the decisions I made in response to an emergent project. So the encounters and the choices that each connect to a new path. Maybe each encounter is an ethical space of engagement, were different interests come together? This means that the previous decisions made, were my point of beginning.

11-10-2024:

Cut 1: The page runs as the voices of thunder narrative (written out)

Place of beginning as an introduction of this thread, explaining what the thread is about, and in what way you as a reader/ researcher are invited to respond.

The cut is threaded with other intra-acting aesthetic actions like the workshop in 2019, the conference calls, the paper, the film, the website, which are each (running) pages themselves

06-10-2024:

Practice: aesthetic action (this is what I/we did - the paths of the map).

Space: corresponding ethics of willingness and boundaries (These are the different corresponding agential forces, e.g. refusal, care, curiosity).

Process: Wayfaring in the apparatus (this is the directional force - exerted by reader).

The logic I am trying out first is adding whole Manuscripts/cuts (aesthetic action) in 1 page and then adding its corresponding forces through links.

Here my H2

My text can go here. Well or not Well-written is just part of the process.

Here. i

am. camilo

there. me

bee

create. this

type of content

Template:CURRENTPAGE 20:15 Template:CURRENTUSER 354

Path 1

This is an Audio test

Subpath

This is my youtube video experiment: