Multiple Sites of Enunciation: Difference between revisions

From Knowledge-land-scape
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Landmark.png|thumb]]
[[File:Landmark small.png|thumb]]


Acknowledging the tension of our differences, when it comes to our entanglements within the overarching polar bear management and monitoring apparatuses, rather than attempting to erase them, aligns with the principles of ethical engagement<ref>Ermine, W. (2007). The ethical space of engagement. Indigenous Law Journal, 6(1), 193–203.</ref><ref>Regulator, A. E. (2017). Voices of Understanding: Looking Through the Window.</ref>., and the Inuit Circumpolar Council Protocol 2 calls for the recognition of Indigenous Knowledge in its own right<ref>Inuit Circumpolar Council (2022). Circumpolar Inuit Protocols for Equitable and Ethical Engagement.</ref>.
The landmark, as a figure, has itself lots to teach us about how to acknowledge and relate to the tension of our differences, when it comes to our entanglements within the overarching polar bear management and monitoring apparatuses


The landmark, as a figure, has itself lots to teach us about how to acknowledge and relate to such differences.
The point here is not to argue whether or not we are looking at the same rock formation, and to agree on how it has changed over time. Neither is it the point that our subjective views change the way that the rocks present themselves to us.
 
As we acknowledge our differences, we move onto our own tracks- and continue our journeys side by side and laterally.
 
As we pass particular points and places in the land, lets say for example a rock formation, our tracks may split. As we each pass the rock formation on each side, two different perspective emerge, as the face of the rock-formation will present itself as different to each of us.
 
The point here is not to argue whether or not we are looking at the same rock formation, or how our subjective views change the way that the rock present themselves to us.
 
The point here is that the rocks are not determinable as separate from ourselves, our position in the landscape, where we have been and where we are going.
Our practice of lateral movement has unfixed the rocks as not just something than can be located out there, but rather as something that can also locate us, and the many other other material agencies that make it possible for us to encounter the rock formation.
 
<div class="next_choice">To locate ourselves alongside the testimonies of Gjoa Haven, in the first place, we had to re-insert our bodies affectively.


The point here is that the rocks can are not determinable as separate from ourselves, our position in the landscape, where we have been and where we are going, when we consider ourselves part of the everchanging landscape.
A practice of lateral movement unfixes the rocks as not just something than can be located out there, but rather as something that can also locate us, and the many other other material agencies that make it possible for us to encounter the rock formation.


<div class="next_choice">
'''"Return"''' to Cut 1 to learn more about how our co-creative practices around the "Voices of Thunder" testimonies, helped us (re-)locate our bodies on such lateral tracks.</div>
'''"Return"''' to Cut 1 to learn more about how our co-creative practices around the "Voices of Thunder" testimonies, helped us (re-)locate our bodies on such lateral tracks.</div>



Latest revision as of 14:56, 18 July 2025

The landmark, as a figure, has itself lots to teach us about how to acknowledge and relate to the tension of our differences, when it comes to our entanglements within the overarching polar bear management and monitoring apparatuses

The point here is not to argue whether or not we are looking at the same rock formation, and to agree on how it has changed over time. Neither is it the point that our subjective views change the way that the rocks present themselves to us.

The point here is that the rocks can are not determinable as separate from ourselves, our position in the landscape, where we have been and where we are going, when we consider ourselves part of the everchanging landscape. A practice of lateral movement unfixes the rocks as not just something than can be located out there, but rather as something that can also locate us, and the many other other material agencies that make it possible for us to encounter the rock formation.

"Return" to Cut 1 to learn more about how our co-creative practices around the "Voices of Thunder" testimonies, helped us (re-)locate our bodies on such lateral tracks.


Return to Cut 1: Voices of Thunder