Aesthetic Action: Difference between revisions
| (61 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Welcome to the in-between. | |||
[[File:1737039042167-3934f768-a251-4572-acf4-33d2c96518b9 1.jpg|thumb|Illustration by Danny Aaluk]] | |||
= | =Aesthetics= | ||
First, before you start following this cut, a note on "aesthetics": | |||
=Aesthetic action and the | Robinson and Martin understand aesthetics as the material and sensuous encounters between bodies-in-action, and the affective forces created in such encounters. What makes "aesthetic action” different from any other action, according to them, is the intentionality of either the action itself or the artist, or the aesthetic experience of the participating actor <ref>Robinson, D., & Martin, K. (Eds.). (2016). Arts of engagement: Taking aesthetic action in and beyond the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press.</ref>. | ||
<small><references /></small> | |||
=Aesthetic Encounter as Knowledge Conciliation= | |||
This cut reconfigures the challenge of knowledge co-production in the context of polar bear monitoring research in Nunavut as one that may come to matter through aesthetic encounters. | |||
You are invited to think alongside the spaces that have emerged from prospective aesthetic actions like co-creating a motion-graphic documentary, building an igloo-, spending time on the land-, sharing food, and artistic interventions. | |||
Together we may feel our way forward through this knowledge-land-scape to understand how such encounters between research partners from Queen’s University and the community of Gjoa Haven, Nunavut have come to matter, and how they may provide meaning in terms of knowledge conciliation. | |||
<div class="next_choice">'''"Detour"''' if you want to read an abstract.</div> | |||
<span class="detour link" data-page-title="Cut 2 Abstract" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Cut 2 Abstract|Detour: Abstract]]</span> | |||
=(Re-)Configurating Space= | |||
The questions I have asked myself alongside the unfolding of some of the events in this knowledge-land-scape are: What kind of spaces open up? What insights emerge within such spaces? What possibilities for cross-cultural exchange, beyond data, become possible? What slippages do they reveal between the promises of ethical knowledge engagement, and the material practices of doing so? And what can we learn from such slippages? | |||
<div class="next_choice">You are presented with a vista "the Ethical Space of Engagement", go check it out to understand how ethical knowledge conciliation can be understood in terms of creating space.</div> | |||
<span class="pop-up vista link" data-page-title="The ESE (Space)" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="Vista">[[The ESE (Space)|Vista: The Ethical Space Engagement: Space]]</span> | |||
=Aesthetic Action and the ESE= | |||
Aesthetics as a concept that is associated with western arts philosophy, but understood here as the affective and sensuous, provides multiple ways to engage and and think with the principles of in-between space, as put forward by Willie Ermine<ref>Ermine, W. (2007). The ethical space of engagement. Indigenous Law Journal, 6(1), 193–203.</ref>. | |||
The artistic qualities of aesthetic actions can provide tools outside of traditional western-scientific paradigms, to facilitate ways of viewing, conducting and presenting research outside of dualistic thinking: the hallmark of classic western philosophy. As such aesthetic action can actively deconstruct, challenge and decenter the dominance of western ways of knowing and establish other sites of ‘enunciation’ - rather than merely critiquing- and re-centering them in the process <ref>Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. routledge.</ref><ref>Simpson, L. R. (2004). Anticolonial strategies for the recovery and maintenance of Indigenous knowledge. American Indian Quarterly, 373-384.</ref><ref>Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues. Postcolonial studies, 17(2), 115-121.</ref> | |||
In its rejection of certainty, the in-between opens up. Irwin’s describes this in-between, and the conditions it provides, as a possibility for ‘becoming’<ref>Irwin, R. L. (2013). Becoming a/r/tography. Studies in Art Education, 54(3), 198-215.</ref>. Irwin discusses ‘becoming’ as something that is placed between two multiplicities, not by becoming the other, but by ‘becoming-other’<ref>ibid</ref>. | |||
<div class="next_choice">Check out the '''"Vista"''' to understand prospectively what this "Becoming Other" might mean - even if you have a suspicion that such "becoming other" is something that will only truly retain meaning in practice.</div> | |||
<small><references /></small> | |||
<span class="pop-up vista link" data-page-title="Becoming Other Vista" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="Vista">[[Becoming Other Vista|Vista: Becoming Other]]</span> | |||
=Aesthetic (in)action in BearWatch= | =Aesthetic (in)action in BearWatch= | ||
You find yourself at a crossroad. Each of the paths forward will guide you across a case-study on aesthetic action in the BearWatch project. | |||
<div class="next_choice">Choose between the aesthetic actions of "community-based filmmaking", "Community Gathering", or "Mx. Science", and explore whether and how they can possibly mark Ethical Spaces of Engagement. | |||
'''"Detour"''' to Point of Beginning Animated Graphic Documentary, to trace the space-making qualities of community-based filmmaking. | |||
or, | |||
'''"Detour"''' to Point of Beginning (Pre-)workshops, to trace the space-making qualities of community gatherings. | |||
or, | |||
'''"Detour"''' to Point of Beginning Mx. Science , to trace the space-making qualities of a particular situated arts-based intervention. | |||
</div> | |||
<span class="detour to-cut-2 link" data-page-title="Point of Beginning Animated Graphic Documentary" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Point of Beginning Animated Graphic Documentary|Detour to Cut 2: Point of Beginning Animated Graphic Documentary]]</span> | |||
<span class="detour to-cut-2 link" data-page-title="Point of Beginning (Pre-)workshops" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Point of Beginning (Pre-)workshops|Detour to Cut 2: Point of Beginning (Pre-)workshops]]</span> | |||
== | <span class="detour to-cut-2 link" data-page-title="Point of Beginning Mx. Science " data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Point of Beginning Mx. Science |Detour to Cut 2: Point of Beginning Mx. Science]]</span> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:57, 9 February 2025
Welcome to the in-between.
Aesthetics[edit]
First, before you start following this cut, a note on "aesthetics":
Robinson and Martin understand aesthetics as the material and sensuous encounters between bodies-in-action, and the affective forces created in such encounters. What makes "aesthetic action” different from any other action, according to them, is the intentionality of either the action itself or the artist, or the aesthetic experience of the participating actor [1].
- ↑ Robinson, D., & Martin, K. (Eds.). (2016). Arts of engagement: Taking aesthetic action in and beyond the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press.
Aesthetic Encounter as Knowledge Conciliation[edit]
This cut reconfigures the challenge of knowledge co-production in the context of polar bear monitoring research in Nunavut as one that may come to matter through aesthetic encounters.
You are invited to think alongside the spaces that have emerged from prospective aesthetic actions like co-creating a motion-graphic documentary, building an igloo-, spending time on the land-, sharing food, and artistic interventions.
Together we may feel our way forward through this knowledge-land-scape to understand how such encounters between research partners from Queen’s University and the community of Gjoa Haven, Nunavut have come to matter, and how they may provide meaning in terms of knowledge conciliation.
(Re-)Configurating Space[edit]
The questions I have asked myself alongside the unfolding of some of the events in this knowledge-land-scape are: What kind of spaces open up? What insights emerge within such spaces? What possibilities for cross-cultural exchange, beyond data, become possible? What slippages do they reveal between the promises of ethical knowledge engagement, and the material practices of doing so? And what can we learn from such slippages?
Vista: The Ethical Space Engagement: Space
Aesthetic Action and the ESE[edit]
Aesthetics as a concept that is associated with western arts philosophy, but understood here as the affective and sensuous, provides multiple ways to engage and and think with the principles of in-between space, as put forward by Willie Ermine[1].
The artistic qualities of aesthetic actions can provide tools outside of traditional western-scientific paradigms, to facilitate ways of viewing, conducting and presenting research outside of dualistic thinking: the hallmark of classic western philosophy. As such aesthetic action can actively deconstruct, challenge and decenter the dominance of western ways of knowing and establish other sites of ‘enunciation’ - rather than merely critiquing- and re-centering them in the process [2][3][4]
In its rejection of certainty, the in-between opens up. Irwin’s describes this in-between, and the conditions it provides, as a possibility for ‘becoming’[5]. Irwin discusses ‘becoming’ as something that is placed between two multiplicities, not by becoming the other, but by ‘becoming-other’[6].
- ↑ Ermine, W. (2007). The ethical space of engagement. Indigenous Law Journal, 6(1), 193–203.
- ↑ Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. routledge.
- ↑ Simpson, L. R. (2004). Anticolonial strategies for the recovery and maintenance of Indigenous knowledge. American Indian Quarterly, 373-384.
- ↑ Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues. Postcolonial studies, 17(2), 115-121.
- ↑ Irwin, R. L. (2013). Becoming a/r/tography. Studies in Art Education, 54(3), 198-215.
- ↑ ibid
Aesthetic (in)action in BearWatch[edit]
You find yourself at a crossroad. Each of the paths forward will guide you across a case-study on aesthetic action in the BearWatch project.
"Detour" to Point of Beginning Animated Graphic Documentary, to trace the space-making qualities of community-based filmmaking.
or,
"Detour" to Point of Beginning (Pre-)workshops, to trace the space-making qualities of community gatherings.
or,
"Detour" to Point of Beginning Mx. Science , to trace the space-making qualities of a particular situated arts-based intervention.
Detour to Cut 2: Point of Beginning Animated Graphic Documentary