Moves Towards Innocence: Difference between revisions

From Knowledge-land-scape
No edit summary
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Great White Beast.png|thumb]]
[[File:Great white beast small.png|thumb]]


You have encountered a Great White Beast!
You have encountered a Great White Beast!


''“It is precisely by denying culpability or assuming that one is not implicated in violent relations toward others, that one is outside them, that violence can be perpetuated. Violence, especially of the liberal varieties, is often most easily perpetrated in the spaces and places where its possibility is unequivocally denounced”''<ref>Berlant in Rothberg, M. (2019 p.49) The implicated subject. Stanford University Press.</ref>.  
The purpose of reconciliation is not to reinscribe settler virtues, nor to cater to comfortable narratives of innocence.  


The purpose of reconciliation is not to reinscribe settler virtues, nor to cater to comfortable narratives of innocence. Rather than merely "passing on" the message of recognition under the obscured positionality of "solidarity", it should be contemplated alongside the concept of implication<ref>Grundy, M., Jiang, J., & Niiya, M. (2019). Solidarity as a settler move to innocence. Race in the Americas</ref>. and by re-inserting our bodies back into the political landscape.  
The challenge of conducting a testimonial reading is that it has us face the "Great White Beasts" of our own bodies in action, instead of allowing us to merely "pass on" the message of recognition under the obscured positionality of "solidarity"<ref>Grundy, M., Jiang, J., & Niiya, M. (2019). Solidarity as a settler move to innocence. ''Race in the Americas''</ref>.  


 
Rather than removing ourselves through detached solidarity, we face being just as intra-dependently entangled with the history of quota setting as we consider the other to be.  
The fallacy of imagining there is an easy road to reconciliation leading to superficial actions that alleviate settler guilt, but do nothing to repatriate land, or undo settler power, coloniality or privilege<ref>Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, education & society, 1(1), 1-40</ref>.  


The challenge of conducting a testimonial reading, is that it requires us to face the "Great White Beasts" of our own actions and identities. A necessary discomfort before we can contemplate the full implications of acting as allies.<ref>Rothberg, M. (2019 p.87) The implicated subject. Stanford University Press.</ref>.
<div class="next_choice">You have stumbled upon another '''Vista''': "Becoming Other". </div>
 
 
<div class="next_choice">You have stumbled upon another '''Vista''': "Becoming Other". Maybe this vista will be able to provide some prospective when it comes to moving beyond positioning ourselves as innocent.</div>





Latest revision as of 13:59, 16 August 2025

You have encountered a Great White Beast!

The purpose of reconciliation is not to reinscribe settler virtues, nor to cater to comfortable narratives of innocence.

The challenge of conducting a testimonial reading is that it has us face the "Great White Beasts" of our own bodies in action, instead of allowing us to merely "pass on" the message of recognition under the obscured positionality of "solidarity"[1].

Rather than removing ourselves through detached solidarity, we face being just as intra-dependently entangled with the history of quota setting as we consider the other to be.

You have stumbled upon another Vista: "Becoming Other".


  1. Grundy, M., Jiang, J., & Niiya, M. (2019). Solidarity as a settler move to innocence. Race in the Americas

Vista:"Becoming Other"