Ethics of Response-Ability: Difference between revisions

From Knowledge-land-scape
Saskia (talk | contribs)
Created page with "You have encountered a “Great White Beast”, a fleeting, shapeshifting figure that performs the world as indeterminate. The possibilities of encountering a Great White Beast is a reminder that there are no right decisions to be made, but that we are nevertheless to hold ourselves accountable to our own choices. In this case such trouble refers to the controversy around western scholarship, when it takes up ideas like intra-dependency and relational worldviews while e..."
 
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
You have encountered a “Great White Beast”, a fleeting, shapeshifting figure that performs the world as indeterminate. The possibilities of encountering a Great White Beast is a reminder that there are no right decisions to be made, but that we are nevertheless to hold ourselves accountable to our own choices.
[[File:Great white beast small.png|thumb]]


In this case such trouble refers to the controversy around western scholarship, when it takes up ideas like intra-dependency and relational worldviews while either ignoring Indigenous literature, or appropriating them, without proper acknowledgement. There is, no ‘easy’ way out of these kinds of tensions for non-indigenous scholars. The ethics involved with drawing from such ontologies in academic work cannot be resolved through ‘right’ ways of doing things.  Non-Indigenous researchers engaging any form of generative ontologies need to take responsibility for whichever option they choose: 1. engaging Indigenous scholarship, or 2. not engaging Indigenous scholarship - While neither option is “innocent” .  
You have encountered a “Great White Beast”, a fleeting, shapeshifting figure that performs the world as indeterminate.  


In dealing with this Great White Beast, I have chosen to rely on a very selective body of western scholarship to formulate ways of thinking outside of the classic western subject/object divide and not appropriate Indigenous scholarship in formulating my own understanding of ontologically generative paradigms. Where appropriate and part of my process I have placed my journey in dialogue with Indigenous sources. This in turn allows you the possibility to do the same.
The ethics involved when it comes to drawing from research paradigms that consider the world as indeterminate, intra-dependent and ontologically generative, cannot be resolved through ‘right’ ways of doing things<ref>Rosiek, J., & Adkins-Cartee, M. (2023). Diffracting structure/agency dichotomies, wave/particle dualities, and the citational politics of settler colonial scholars engaging Indigenous studies literature. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 23(2), 157-169.</ref>.


<div class="next_choice">Non-Indigenous researchers engaging any form of generative ontologies need to take responsibility for whichever option they choose:


<span class="return link" data-page-title="Wayfaring the BW project Point of Beginning" data-section-id="6" data-encounter-type="return">[[Wayfaring the BW project Point of Beginning#TEK Workshops|Cut 3: Wayfaring the BW project Point of Beginning]]</span>
'''Engaging Indigenous scholarship.'''
 
 
Or,
 
 
'''Not engaging Indigenous scholarship.'''
 
Neither option is “innocent.” There are no "easy ways out".</div>
 
 
<small><references /></small>
 
<span class="detour to-cut-3 link" data-page-title="Engage Indigenous Scholarship" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Engage Indigenous Scholarship|Detour: Engage Indigenous Scholarship]]</span>
 
<span class="detour to-cut-3 link" data-page-title="Not Engaging Indigenous Scholarship" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Not Engaging Indigenous Scholarship|Detour: Do Not Engage Indigenous Scholarship]]</span>

Latest revision as of 14:47, 18 July 2025

You have encountered a “Great White Beast”, a fleeting, shapeshifting figure that performs the world as indeterminate.

The ethics involved when it comes to drawing from research paradigms that consider the world as indeterminate, intra-dependent and ontologically generative, cannot be resolved through ‘right’ ways of doing things[1].

Non-Indigenous researchers engaging any form of generative ontologies need to take responsibility for whichever option they choose:

Engaging Indigenous scholarship.


Or,


Not engaging Indigenous scholarship.

Neither option is “innocent.” There are no "easy ways out".


  1. Rosiek, J., & Adkins-Cartee, M. (2023). Diffracting structure/agency dichotomies, wave/particle dualities, and the citational politics of settler colonial scholars engaging Indigenous studies literature. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 23(2), 157-169.

Detour: Engage Indigenous Scholarship

Detour: Do Not Engage Indigenous Scholarship