The Land: Difference between revisions

From Knowledge-land-scape
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Vista.png|thumb]]
[[File:Vista small.png|thumb|alt=A round shaped collage of Nunavut landscapes photographed during all seasons, with an overlay of a circular calendar]]


Donna Haraway argues, inspired by Ursula le Guin (1986), that the kind of stories we need telling in these times are not those of the Antropos. Not those of the capitalized Human in History and all the weaponized tools such a Human might carry, but those of the netbag, the basket, or any other concave shape. Such a netbag, or even a pair of cupped hands enables carrying things along, and receiving and giving away. Such exchange suggests ongoing stories of becoming with-; a collective making and unmaking of the world with ‘companion species’ as ‘kin’ (Haraway, 2003 ; 2016). These stories acknowledge messy, earthbound, multispecies entanglements, rather than man-making tales of the single hero.
Whether it is replacing the runners of a qamutiq, collecting fish samples, or camping out next to a Weir. These events provide and require knowledge that cannot be disconnected from the land.  


Whether collecting fish samples, or camping out next to a Weir. Both events provide knowledge. Both kinds of knowledges are needed for sustainable wildlife conservation.  
<div class="next_choice">It is not so much that science and IQ would paint a complementary, but separate, picture of the land. It's that neither the land, nor IQ, nor western science about such land-based encounters can exists in intelligible ways outside of their intra-dependent relationships. Any differentiation made between these knowledges and the land are artificial, not pre-determined.


<div class="next_choice">This first meaningful visit to both communities has resulted in lots of experiences and materials to work with. You have many picture and auto-ethnographic diary pages. Some interviews, many informal conversations and lots of participation with day to day events, as well as many minutes of video footage and multiple drawing sessions for the co-creative research outputs provide for lots of opportunities to think with- Go home and sit with everything before you return to the field in Spring 2022.  
Go outside, and touch some dirt.
Take a walk.


Take a walk</div>
Then, '''"Return"''' to Cut 3.</div>


<span class="return to cut 3 link" data-page-title="Wayfaring_the_BW_project" data-section-id="6" data-encounter-type="return">[[Wayfaring the BW project#Meetings Spring 2022 Gjoa Haven|Cut 3: Gjoa Haven fieldwork 2022]]</span>
 
 
 
 
<span class="return to cut 3 link" data-page-title="Wayfaring_the_BW_project" data-section-id="9" data-encounter-type="return">[[Wayfaring the BW project#Community-Lead Sampling Coral Harbour Spring 2022|Return to Cut 3: Community-lead Sampling in Coral Harbour]]</span>

Latest revision as of 12:09, 18 July 2025

A round shaped collage of Nunavut landscapes photographed during all seasons, with an overlay of a circular calendar

Whether it is replacing the runners of a qamutiq, collecting fish samples, or camping out next to a Weir. These events provide and require knowledge that cannot be disconnected from the land.

It is not so much that science and IQ would paint a complementary, but separate, picture of the land. It's that neither the land, nor IQ, nor western science about such land-based encounters can exists in intelligible ways outside of their intra-dependent relationships. Any differentiation made between these knowledges and the land are artificial, not pre-determined.

Go outside, and touch some dirt. Take a walk.

Then, "Return" to Cut 3.



Return to Cut 3: Community-lead Sampling in Coral Harbour