Learning About Landmarks: Difference between revisions

From Knowledge-land-scape
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Saskia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Landmarks are defining features in the land that traditionally play an important role in Inuit topographical understandings of their land and its resources. They are important orienting features to keep one's bearing while travelling and to determine where one is located at any given moment. As a figure in this knowledge-land-scape they perform a more immediate materialization of certain findings and insights along the way. They are not always obvious when you follow only the three main cuts of the knowledge-land-scape. They rather reveal themselves in response to specific invitations, practices or actions taken. As such, the insight that these landmarks have to offer are always particular to the paths and trails that lead towards them, and their meaning materializes in relation to where you come from, where are you going and what decisions you have made on the way. Like on the land, landmarks look different depending on from which vantage point you encounter them.  
[[File:Landmark.png|thumb]]


<span class="next_choice"> As you have approached this specific landmark to take a closer look, you can’t help but noticing that you have many questions about me -the author-, the choices that I have made, and the methods that I have chosen to share my research. “Stay with the Trouble” to learn more on how to deal with such questions.</span>
Landmarks are defining features in the land that traditionally play an important role in Inuit topographical understandings of their land and its resources. They are important orienting features to keep one's bearing while travelling and to determine where one is located at any given moment<ref>Aporta, C. (2004). Routes, trails and tracks: Trail breaking among the Inuit of Igloolik. Études/Inuit/Studies, 28(2), 9-38.</ref>.


<span class="pop-up stay with the trouble link" data-page-title="Learning About Staying With the Trouble">[[Learning About Staying With the Trouble]]</span>
As a figure in this Knowledge-Land-Scape, "Landmarks" perform the materialization of certain findings and emergent insights along the way. They are not always obvious when you trace only the three main cuts of the knowledge-land-scape. They rather reveal themselves in response to specific invitations, practices or actions taken.
 
As such, the insight that these landmarks have to offer are always particular to the paths and trails that lead towards them, and their meaning materializes in relation to where you come from, where are you going and what decisions you have made on the way- both before, during and after you have entered this scape. 
 
<div class="next_choice"> As you have approached this specific landmark to take a closer look, you can’t help but noticing that you have many concerns and questions about this figurative land-scape approach to research.
 
It seems that this Landmark takes a multitude of shapes, depending on from which direction you approach it.
 
'''“Stay with the Trouble”''' to learn more about how such multiplicity is performed in this Knowledge-Land-Scape.</div>
 
 
 
 
 
<small><references /></small>
 
<span class="pop-up stay-with-the-trouble link" data-page-title=" Learning About Staying With the Trouble " data-encounter-type="Stay-with-the-trouble">[[Learning About Staying With the Trouble|Stay with the trouble: Learning About Staying With the Trouble]]</span>

Latest revision as of 12:57, 18 March 2025

Landmarks are defining features in the land that traditionally play an important role in Inuit topographical understandings of their land and its resources. They are important orienting features to keep one's bearing while travelling and to determine where one is located at any given moment[1].

As a figure in this Knowledge-Land-Scape, "Landmarks" perform the materialization of certain findings and emergent insights along the way. They are not always obvious when you trace only the three main cuts of the knowledge-land-scape. They rather reveal themselves in response to specific invitations, practices or actions taken.

As such, the insight that these landmarks have to offer are always particular to the paths and trails that lead towards them, and their meaning materializes in relation to where you come from, where are you going and what decisions you have made on the way- both before, during and after you have entered this scape.

As you have approached this specific landmark to take a closer look, you can’t help but noticing that you have many concerns and questions about this figurative land-scape approach to research.

It seems that this Landmark takes a multitude of shapes, depending on from which direction you approach it.

“Stay with the Trouble” to learn more about how such multiplicity is performed in this Knowledge-Land-Scape.



  1. Aporta, C. (2004). Routes, trails and tracks: Trail breaking among the Inuit of Igloolik. Études/Inuit/Studies, 28(2), 9-38.

Stay with the trouble: Learning About Staying With the Trouble