Refuse: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This gathering, at the hamlet, | This gathering, at the hamlet, showed no clear possibilities for the emergence of ethical space, practice or process, due to a lack of input from the local co-PI, the HTO, or a community advisory board like we had in Gjoa Haven. | ||
I decide therefore to withdraw my co-constitutive role of being a host, nor to attend as Mx. Science. | I decide therefore to withdraw my co-constitutive role of being a host, nor to attend as Mx. Science. | ||
Revision as of 11:18, 6 March 2025
This gathering, at the hamlet, showed no clear possibilities for the emergence of ethical space, practice or process, due to a lack of input from the local co-PI, the HTO, or a community advisory board like we had in Gjoa Haven.
I decide therefore to withdraw my co-constitutive role of being a host, nor to attend as Mx. Science.
Complete refusal will, however, not only compromise the final workshops in Coral Harbour. It will also break promises that were made with the principle of the school.
Student involvement and science-based activities are expected by several teachers and pupils, and much resources have been expended to provide possibilities for the extended community to learn about the research that was done around their community.
I still hold response-abilities to the BearWatch team and the community members that I had made agreements with.
"Claim Failure" instead.