Experiment

• 32 px x 32 px png or svg.

• Export for web 1200 px. (bitmap)

Final check-ins Camilo:

• Dead-end background is great -really works like this! Also with the placement of the back button, and the fact that "keep going disappears after. Perfect!

• I have noticed though, that it often glitches a bit.

Instructions: Ways to Navigate this Space SOMETIMES goes back to Instructions: Ways to Navigate this Space#Invitations, instead of Instructions: Ways to Navigate this Space#Ice-Pressure Ridges

Detour: look up the meaning of "intra-dependency" Or it just errors alltogether.

But it worked straight after you uploaded it!!! I saw it - and I like it!

• Questions about buttons:

1. Displaying "Detour to cut 1", "Detour to cut 2", "Detour to cut 3" on the buttons look good to me! Because the page titles are displayed when you hover over them, it is clear where you are going! They also line up nicely now!
3. Could the "Return" button displays have same logic? Now it just says " Return". Otherwise I will add the cut to the page title - no problem!

• * I actually just now, through your email, understand what the : does!!! That's really helpful! - I will get on changing this everywhere. This is declaration list I will be using:

Detour:

Detour:

Detour to Cut 1:

Detour to Cut 2:

Detour to Cut 3:

Pop-up:

Landmark:

Wrecksite:

Vista:

Stay with the trouble: (I changed this one from "Staying with the trouble")

Redirective:

Invitation:

Ice-pressure ridge:

Return:

Return:

Return to Cut 1:

Return to Cut 2:

Return to Cut 3:

Wishlist (this is for when we have resources/ if not now):

• Should we incorporate a pop-up map? Under the instruction button?

• Can we colour-code the trace?

• And a legend?

• mobile responsive

Resolved

• How do I link to the homepage? There will be homepage button - change text.

• "Next choice" paragraphs: Italic formatting is not continued when I create more than 2 paragraphs.
  wrap instead of wrap.

• I made some backgrounds for the homepage and pop-up pages (email on Monday 13th January)

• Redirections "Invitation" and "ice-pressure ridge" also have last headings that should not have a "move forward" button. I will list the final headings of their pages below. This will now be "dead-ends"

• i think I am inclined to no longer have a "go back" button.... There are enough moments to return. And it leaves more space for the "pop-up images".

• Can we make the "detour" and "pressure ridges" and "invitation" texts that appear under the text block smaller? (let me know if this is something you need me to do...) They overlap with the block now, or could we stick to the original fonts? Right now it looks a little messy to me... (although, I suspect it is just something that you haven't gotten to yet).

• • We could try the hover option

• Without the "go back' button, could we make the pop-up images a little bigger?

• Is there a plugin for file downloads? I would like there to be a link or download button for the linearly written manuscripts on the "end" pages.

I will also embed the miro map on this last page - and ask people to reflect on their trace.

• The names of the pop-ups: wrecksites / landmarks / staying with the trouble / vista's might change based on community feedback - so this makes me think that perhaps they should not be presented in my handwriting... I assume the handwritten buttons are not scripted from the wikimedia. So i think it is safer to have a wikimedia generated title under the pop-up images. If they are made to be changeable in the wikimedia, this means that they could change based on community feedback right?

• I have some similar concerns for the 'last heading' issue, so that it doesn't keep saying "keep going" and leading us to dead-ends - when I add new trails, after today.

• Within the Wrecksite "Knowledge Co-production" (cut 3) I keep seeing the code at the end of my next choice paragraph.

final headings pages, invitations and ice-pressure ridges:

I will list them here:

"Ways to Navigate this Space" on this Homepage

consists of 2 pages.

Page 1:Instructions: Ways to Navigate this Space runs to "Redirectives: Ice Pressure Ridges"[5]

Page 2:Encounters Along the Way runs to "Another Point of Beginning"[2]

Cut 1

consists of 2 pages.

Page 1:Voices of Thunder runs to "Ongoing Conversations"[4]

Page 2:Multiple Voices runs to "Another Point of Beginning" [11]

Ice Pressure Ridge: Covid 19 personal whereabouts runs to "Kingston in Isolation" [3]

Invitation: Conference calls from the road runs to "Dwelling" [4]

Invitation: Vulnerability runs to "Unsettlement" [1]

Synopsis Voices of Thunder Is a stand-alone page/heading

Knowledge Co-production in BearWatch Is a stand-alone page/heading

Cut 3

consists of 3 pages

page 1: Wayfaring the BW project Point of Beginning runs to "Covid-19" [9]

page 2: Wayfaring the BW project runs to 'Arctic Travel" [9]

page 3: Fall 2022 Gjoa Haven runs to "Another Point of Beginning" [3]

Detour page: Intra-dependency runs to "Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape" [1]

GE3Ls is a stand-alone page/heading

Spring  Coral Harbour is a stand-alone ice-pressure ridge page/header

Invitation: Caribou hunt runs to "Painting Cabin" [1]

Design notes for Camilo:

Wikimedia Page= Cut/Track/Manuscript (generative action/physical manifestation/Academic format)

A page is a run-on, linear narrative track that cuts along the KLS, which makes it possible for the reader to trace an academic manuscript These tracks have a point of beginning, and they end at another point of beginning

Sometimes a narrative cut/track splits off in multiple different branches. In this case the page end with the heading after which narrative track branches out. Links are offered to multiple "new" points of beginning under this last heading. This for example happens in cut2; 3. Aesthetic (in)action in BearWatch, which splits of into 2 "new" places of beginning (and also has a "hidden" third "new" place of beginning).

Different linking logics, use of terms and syntax:

Run-of-the-page tracks

Run-of-the-page tracks that can be traced as a linear cut through the KLS, are marked in Miro by a solid arrow

When people follow one cut linearly, they are "tracing" this narrative. There is not a lot of interaction, or transformative engagement taking place. When people choose to interact with the possibilities that are offered to divert or pivot on the way, it means that they are "threading" their own narrative. Such threading is intra-active between reader, writer, designer, and all the other more-than-human manifestive agents that shape the KLS.

Front-end options?

Rather than reading the text through a scroll-down format, I would like to see if there is a possibility to move "through" it, per (sub)heading. See thumb below?

As they engage with different kind of content (points of beginning, research creation etc.) maybe there can be a visual style to that (if we have time)

Detours and return links

"Detours" and "returns" allow for users to thread their own narratives between cuts. They are marked in Miro by a striped arrow in a particular direction. They exist in 2 versions:

Detour (Black striped arrow in Miro)

Return(Purple striped arrow in Miro) I have started to take some of these out

Redirections

"Redirections allow readers to wayfare or dwell- to be curious, to divert from previous trajectories, "waste" time and be curious. It is actually the main action that I hope my readers will engage in- and is also the most effective way to encounter "hidden" vistas and landmarks along the way.

There are two kinds of redirections: ( thin dotted black line in Miro)

Pressure ridges

"Pressure ridges" are re-directive agential forces that mark the de/limitations of the KLS, and the im/possibilities of how we can move through it. It's a referral to the agential forces and apparatuses at play which mark the extent of possibilities within a particular generative action - in this case it marks the boundaries of what is included in the KLS, and it also marks the boundaries of the extent that users can make tracing/threading/wayfaring choices. User decision-making in their wayfaring choices may be generative of insights to the degree that the KLS gives them options to choose, limiting such directional choices marks that not everything is possible within a given phenomena, including this KLS.

Invitations and Ice-pressure ridges

As you respond to a redirective force you follow a trail-off. This trail may connect multiple invites or ice-pressure ridges marked in Miro by post-its, or just one. The trail usually picks up where you left the track, or it will include return links.

Different Pop-up phenomena in wikimedia and the KLS: their terms, Miro-design and syntax

Pop-up phenomena are phenomena that either; de/markate the im/possibilities of the KLS, like Staying with the trouble and Shipwrecks, or ones that help navigating the KLS, like Landmarks and Vista'

Front-end options?

op ups are material agents. They create the conditions under which, or alongside which, the user makes their decisions. Or they may perform clarifying moments. Due to this nature, I envision them as visually intrusive pop-up' elements, that you may click to explore and understand better through reading the accompanying text. But even if you do not want explore those phenomena further, you cannot ignore them in the first place. This means I need to design a visual element that can serve as a click-able pop-up for each category.

Pop-ups are marked in Miro with thick dotted lines in different colours

Wrecksites

The difference between what can exist, and what can not exist as part of a phenomena, are produced within phenomena by the im/material agencies of the (inquiring) apparatus-in encounter that constantly make and remake such determining agential cuts. ‘Our inquiries, in other words, do not simply generate knowledge, they generate realities’ (Rosiek, in Leavy, 2017 p. 638). The ice pressure ridge, mentioned above, is just one example of such material agency within the apparatus in encounter. Here and there, the wrecksites of the larger settler-colonial state apparatus also reveal themselves as materially constitutive agents in the KLS.

Where they reveal themselves in the Miro they are marked by thick red dotted lines in Miro.

(I may decide to leave these phenomena out, as I fear they might not be "material enough" - or may be the same as pressure ridges)

stay with the trouble

Staying with the trouble is to encounter a Great White Beast, it reminds us that there are no right decisions to be made. The responsive decisions that were made during the processes which have shaped the KLS. It is a form of making myself accountable. When the world is ‘remade’ in each meeting, it means that there is an imperative to take responsibility for the intra-active relations you build and the future relations your research makes possible or forecloses (Barad, 2007 p.x; see also Rosiek & Adkins-Cartee, 2023 p.160). Considering that the relations between reader and author are partially influenced by the positionality of the researcher, the methods they use and the concepts they apply, each research generates knowledge that is particular to its specific ‘agential cut’ (Barad 2007, p. 185). Wrecksites provide insights into my own my abilities to respond and "stay with the trouble".

trouble will pop-up in various forms, and their pop-up nature is marked in Miro with thick green dotted lines.

Landmark

Landmarks perform emergent insights in response to tracing and threading certain sequential actions or practices. As you are re-redirected by pressure ridges and enticed to trail-off along certain sidetracks, you are presented with particular insights. These insights are directly connected to your responsive and immersive engagement with other agents of the KLS. Did you partake in coffee breaks, bingo, trying country food, and give people rides? To the dump for example? Or to get ice? This is where much of the ethical engagement takes place- and as such they are almost exclusively presented at side-trails, or along pressure ridges.

Landmarks can take various forms. i will design visuals for each one. (In the Miro they are marked with a blue dotted line).

Vista

Vistas, or ethical principles, function to assist in your orientation as you may seek to ethically engage with some of the work that you encounter along the way. Vistas unveil the ethical outlines on which I have relied to chart my course across the knowledge-land-scape of my research. They are emergent aspirational guidelines that may help guide you along the different tracks and trails you intra-act with. These trails are, after all, shaped by my personal considerations and response-abilities while I navigated this scape.

Vista's can take various forms. i will design visuals for each one. (In the Miro they are marked with a blue dotted line.)

Legend:

The final legend will be included on the welcome/landing page

Landing page:

Here you can find the landingpage

Here you can find an oversight of all the pages

Front-end wishlist/desires

I am in general just very open to your suggestions.

Here are some wishlist items (mostly for myself to note)

03-12-2024

-Navigation buttons, better to pop up immediately

-"One step back" button

21-11-2024

At the end a map appears with greyed out elements where the user didnt go, and colour-poping parts of the map where they did end up going.

Maybe I can hyperlink texts, that show up as suggested "connected moments" across time/not choices for navigation (Moments, events and encounters that together emerge as an idea)

And these are conceptually important to me:

I hope to eventually create a body-on-the-ground experience (navigating "in" the KLS)- instead of the bird-eye perspective of a map (reading "about" the KLS). The Miro map can be a resource for people, if they want, but I think it is cooler if they can navigate without (see for example the https://feralatlas.supdigital.org/). This sketch maybe clarifies what I was describing this afternoon.

The interface of this link, makes use of the story frames of navigating "in" the KLS as sketched above: https://fielddaylab.wisc.edu/play/headlines/

while this one is a good example of a scrolling site that still gives you the impression of navigating "through" - although that has much to do with the fact that there is little writing involved: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-32057601

Some other ideas:

Different visual formats/colours for each cut/research creation/points of beginning

Process Notes for round 5:

19-11-24

Aesthetic action will be populated last. It emerges in-between. Cut 1 is practice, Cut 3 is process. So cut 2 will be space. It all kind of makes sense.

Letting yourself be lead from the trajectory, the detours, allow for opportunities to for example engagae, inspire, create, spend time. See "Spending time vista"

Perhaps Round 5 could be a discussion of the different vista's that have emerged?

Process documentation:

19-11-2024

ESE vista's, maybe one for each cut. Each one corresponding mor eexplicitely to practice, process and space!!!!

Cspan links added for the whole of Cut 1. i also realized that there there needs to be some guiding text at the bottom, that introduces the choices. this is so that the "buttons" stay small enough.

However it really, changes the directionality of writing, because there is somewhat of a dialogue. And agency in-between reader and author. this is now also wrapped in its own style.

14-11-2024

I made a change on the Workshop Summer 2019 heading on the detour link to TEK workshops. But later I thought that perhaps Camilo had made a change by putting detour links sperate. Not sure what to do. So I stopped editting the linking structure at those places of cut 3 that intersect with cut 1.

05-11-2024

Collage vista's and landmarks? Categorize different pop-up pages, ridges and trails?

30-10-2024

Ask Camilo to install https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cite this is for Voices of Thunder#Response-ability

Also discuss how and where to put the references (each header?) AND at the end of each thread?

28-10-2024

Start thinking of visual language. I want a partial on-the-ground perspective with a horizon that indicates landmarks and vista's that help navigating, not a god's eye perspective. Could I generate a 3D model with Echo of my miro board? and then render and sketch out the horizon? for each heading? Or will I sketch different landmarks as they emerge when following the cut. Or both?

Start adding reference pictures here.

27-10-2024

Politics of recognition is an example of unresolvable tension, without any right way of doing things. In Invivo- I have marked these as "staying with the trouble" - They should pop-up as a category, at certain points of each cut. Like the other "vista's". They are added as bold in-text page links

I have started to think of categories for these "pop-ups": External influence/agential apparatus of PB monitoring, conservation, natural science etc./pressure ridges - Emergent insights/landmarks - Imaginaries that can function as buoys/vista's.

Navigation levels are now as follows I think (see Miro graph visualization):

Run-of-the page = cut (solid line) - doesn't avoid certain agential pressure ridges see below like covid or arctic travel.

In text links = are non-linear options/ reader agency to (re)turn to other cuts (striped line)

Bold in text links bottom of heading =

Either Green and purple post-its wayfaring invitations, to respond - or to be re-directed by agential pressure ridges (marked in miro by dotted line)

Or Vista's and landmarks = suggested "pop-ups" only when reader hits certain post-its. (those are the emergent insights around the ESE).

25-10-2024

The Wayfaring thread is a linear cut, it follows the BW project process. I add headers on level 4 and 5:

level 4

is response-ability/choices/ethical considerations

level 5

is External material agencies / pressure ridges

Not sure what to do with Politics of recognition yet - how it is connected to wayfaring (see 27-10 for further thought).

24-10-2024

Maybe wayfaring thread cut is indeed not linear, but has a point of beginning and weaves throughout the 2 other cuts. -Wayfaring is the process. -The ESE are the in-between spaces that emerge while wayfaring. These spaces are their own pages? Like the vista's suggested below? -The 2 cuts are the practices

15-10-2024

What if the vista's / landmarks emerge on the "horizon", when one hits certain "sidequests?"

14-10-2024

The narrative can't be the manuscript. because it is a knowledge product. The manuscript is then the decisions I made, and the process of an emergent project. So the encounters and the choices that each connect, or lay out a certain path. For example you can go straight from the workshops page to the output if you want - skipping the problematizing of "description".

Maybe each encounter (page, or subheading) is an ethical space of engagement, were different interests come together? This means that the previous decisions made (like the workshops in 2019 in my case), lead to the current encounter.

11-10-2024:

Cut 1: The page runs as the voices of thunder narrative (written out)

Place of beginning as an introduction of this thread, explaining what the thread is about, and in what way you as a reader/ researcher are invited to respond.

The cut is threaded with other intra-acting aesthetic actions like the workshop in 2019, the conference calls, the paper, the film, the website, which are each (running) pages themselves

06-10-2024:

Practice: aesthetic action (this is what I/we did - the paths of the map).

Space: corresponding ethics of willingness and boundaries (These are the different corresponding agential forces, e.g. refusal, care, curiosity).

Process: Wayfaring in the apparatus (this is the directional force - exerted by reader).

The logic I am trying out first is adding whole Manuscripts/cuts (aesthetic action) in 1 page and then adding its corresponding forces through links.

Here my H2

My text can go here. Well or not Well-written is just part of the process.

Here. i

am. camilo

there. me

bee

create. this

type of content

Template:CURRENTPAGE 21:06 Template:CURRENTUSER 354

Path 1

This is an Audio test

Subpath

This is my youtube video experiment: