Intra-dependency - Revision history

Saskia: /* Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape */

2025-07-18T14:43:41Z

Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 18 July 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	In fact, we (you, I and many others) have already started to move forward alongside each other in our emergent processes of becoming knowledgeable together.		In fact, we (you, I and many others) have already started to move forward alongside each other in our emergent processes of becoming knowledgeable together.

	[[File:~~DSC00852~~.jpg\|thumb]]		[[File:Traces.jpg\|thumb\|Qamutik traces in the snow (photograph by de Wildt, 2023)]]

	The company for us to be- and think with in this knowledge-land-scape varies, but emerges for a large part from the encounters I had as I threaded my way through my fieldwork in the hamlets of Uqsuqtuuq (Gjoa Haven) and Salliq (Coral Harbour) of Kitikmeot- and Kivalliq regions in the territory of Nunavut respectively.		The company for us to be- and think with in this knowledge-land-scape varies, but emerges for a large part from the encounters I had as I threaded my way through my fieldwork in the hamlets of Uqsuqtuuq (Gjoa Haven) and Salliq (Coral Harbour) of Kitikmeot- and Kivalliq regions in the territory of Nunavut respectively.

	=Possibilities=		=Possibilities=

Saskia: /* Possibilities */

2025-02-27T09:50:59Z

Possibilities

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 27 February 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:


	'''"Stay with the Trouble"''' to explore how these ideas holds up against Indigenous paradigms, and to navigate this respectfully.		'''"Stay with the Trouble"''' to explore how these ideas holds up against Indigenous paradigms, and how to navigate this respectfully.

Saskia: /* Possibilities */

2025-02-26T22:26:24Z

Possibilities

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 26 February 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:
	This cut, "Wayfaring the BearWatch Project", is all about recognizing such possibilities and responding to them through a practice of wayfaring.		This cut, "Wayfaring the BearWatch Project", is all about recognizing such possibilities and responding to them through a practice of wayfaring.

	<div class="next_choice">		<div class="next_choice">Make a choice:
	Make a choice:

Saskia at 22:22, 26 February 2025

2025-02-26T22:22:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 26 February 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~''"One is too few, two is too many.”''~~

	~~(Barad, 2010, p. 251)~~



	~~“Between" will never be the same again.~~

	When the world is understood as not consisting of fixed, clearly bounded, individual “things”, but rather as emerging phenomena in constant states of becoming- the world can no longer be understood to consists of “inter” dependent parts to a whole.		When the world is understood as not consisting of fixed, clearly bounded, individual “things”, but rather as emerging phenomena in constant states of becoming- the world can no longer be understood to consists of “inter” dependent parts to a whole.

	~~Instead the world,~~ starts performing as through “intra” dependent relationships that are themselves generative of “wholeness”.		It rather starts performing through “intra” dependent relationships that are with-in themselves generative of “wholeness”.

	Such wholeness no longer separates subjects (meaning-makers) from objects (observable phenomena), but considers these as co-constitutive.		Such wholeness no longer separates subjects (meaning-makers) from objects (observable phenomena), but considers these as co-constitutive.

	~~Karen Barad asserts that: ‘Matter and meaning are not separate elements~~. ~~They are inextricably fused together, and no event, no matter how energetic, can tear them asunder’…~~		We cannot know the world independent from ourselves.

	=Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape=		=Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape=
Line 23:		Line 15:
	The company for us to be- and think with in this knowledge-land-scape varies, but emerges for a large part from the encounters I had as I threaded my way through my fieldwork in the hamlets of Uqsuqtuuq (Gjoa Haven) and Salliq (Coral Harbour) of Kitikmeot- and Kivalliq regions in the territory of Nunavut respectively.		The company for us to be- and think with in this knowledge-land-scape varies, but emerges for a large part from the encounters I had as I threaded my way through my fieldwork in the hamlets of Uqsuqtuuq (Gjoa Haven) and Salliq (Coral Harbour) of Kitikmeot- and Kivalliq regions in the territory of Nunavut respectively.

			=Possibilities=
	I was, for example invited to join along with caribou hunts, joined in with ice-fishing, rode an All-Terrain Vehicle to camp out at a fishing weir, collected ice, and took rides in the back of a qamutik (sled) to spend time at cabins, or check on breathing-holes and dens of seals. Within the communities, I learnt about the meaning of opening prayers at special meetings, and igloo building, as well as the “marginal”, every-day, material logistics that are part of land-based monitoring research projects in the Arctic, like car repairs, cargo transport, seasonal travel, and getting stuck for days during my regional travels multiple times due to blizzards and cancelled flights.		I was, for example invited to join along with caribou hunts, joined in with ice-fishing, rode an All-Terrain Vehicle to camp out at a fishing weir, collected ice, and took rides in the back of a qamutik (sled) to spend time at cabins, or check on breathing-holes and dens of seals. Within the communities, I learnt about the meaning of opening prayers at special meetings, and igloo building, as well as the “marginal”, every-day, material logistics that are part of land-based monitoring research projects in the Arctic, like car repairs, cargo transport, seasonal travel, and getting stuck for days during my regional travels multiple times due to blizzards and cancelled flights.

Line 29:		Line 22:
	This cut, "Wayfaring the BearWatch Project", is all about recognizing such possibilities and responding to them through a practice of wayfaring.		This cut, "Wayfaring the BearWatch Project", is all about recognizing such possibilities and responding to them through a practice of wayfaring.

	<div class="next_choice">~~You notice apparent similarities between "intra-dependency" as I have put forward here, and Indigenous, monist ontologies.~~		<div class="next_choice">


	Make a choice:		Make a choice:


	'''"Stay with the Trouble"''' to explore how these ideas holds up against ~~the principle of "respecting difference" that you encountered earlier~~.		'''"Stay with the Trouble"''' to explore how these ideas holds up against Indigenous paradigms, and to navigate this respectfully.

Saskia at 22:03, 12 February 2025

2025-02-12T22:03:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 12 February 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''"One is too few, two is too many.”''		''"One is too few, two is too many.”''

	~~''“'Between' will never be the same."''~~

	(Barad, 2010, p. 251)		(Barad, 2010, p. 251)
Line 7:		Line 5:


			“Between" will never be the same again.

	When the world is understood as not consisting of fixed, clearly bounded, individual “things”, but rather as emerging phenomena in constant states of becoming- the world can no longer be understood to consists of “inter” dependent parts to a whole.		When the world is understood as not consisting of fixed, clearly bounded, individual “things”, but rather as emerging phenomena in constant states of becoming- the world can no longer be understood to consists of “inter” dependent parts to a whole.

Saskia at 22:02, 12 February 2025

2025-02-12T22:02:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 12 February 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''"One is too few, two is too many.”''		''"One is too few, two is too many.”''
	''
	“'Between' will never be the same."''		''“'Between' will never be the same."''

	(Barad, 2010, p. 251)		(Barad, 2010, p. 251)

Saskia: /* Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape */

2025-02-12T21:41:20Z

Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 12 February 2025
Line 38:		Line 38:

	'''"Stay with the Trouble"''' to explore how these ideas holds up against the principle of "respecting difference" that you encountered earlier.		'''"Stay with the Trouble"''' to explore how these ideas holds up against the principle of "respecting difference" that you encountered earlier.


	Or,		Or,

Saskia: /* Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape */

2025-02-12T21:40:24Z

Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 12 February 2025
Line 30:		Line 30:

	This cut, "Wayfaring the BearWatch Project", is all about recognizing such possibilities and responding to them through a practice of wayfaring.		This cut, "Wayfaring the BearWatch Project", is all about recognizing such possibilities and responding to them through a practice of wayfaring.

	~~Cut 2, "Aesthetic Action", is all about exploring what kind of spaces open up through such aesthetic encounter~~

	<div class="next_choice">You notice apparent similarities between "intra-dependency" as I have put forward here, and Indigenous, monist ontologies.		<div class="next_choice">You notice apparent similarities between "intra-dependency" as I have put forward here, and Indigenous, monist ontologies.
Line 37:		Line 35:

	Make a choice:		Make a choice:


	'''"Stay with the Trouble"''' to explore how these ideas holds up against the principle of "respecting difference" that you encountered earlier.		'''"Stay with the Trouble"''' to explore how these ideas holds up against the principle of "respecting difference" that you encountered earlier.

Saskia at 21:39, 12 February 2025

2025-02-12T21:39:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 12 February 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''"One is too few, two is too many.”		''"One is too few, two is too many.”''
			''
	~~“Between”~~ will never be the same.''		“'Between' will never be the same."''

	(Barad, 2010, p. 251)		(Barad, 2010, p. 251)

Saskia: /* Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape */

2025-02-12T21:38:13Z

Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 12 February 2025
Line 19:		Line 19:
	=Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape=		=Wayfaring and the Knowledge-Land-Scape=

	In fact, we (you, I and many others) have already started to move forward alongside each other in our emergent processes of becoming knowledgeable~~. The idea here is that, instead of me presenting a descriptive narrative on ethical engagement and ethical space, we get to partially perform its mechanisms~~ together ~~– side by side~~.		In fact, we (you, I and many others) have already started to move forward alongside each other in our emergent processes of becoming knowledgeable together.

	[[File:DSC00852.jpg\|thumb]]		[[File:DSC00852.jpg\|thumb]]

	The company for us to be- and think with in this knowledge-land-scape varies, but emerges for a large part from the encounters I had as I threaded my way through my fieldwork in the hamlets of Uqsuqtuuq (Gjoa Haven) and Salliq (Coral Harbour) of Kitikmeot- and Kivalliq regions in the territory of Nunavut respectively. I was, for example invited to join along with caribou hunts, joined in with ice-fishing, rode an All-Terrain Vehicle to camp out at a fishing weir, collected ice, and took rides in the back of a qamutik (sled) to spend time at cabins, or check on breathing-holes and dens of seals. Within the communities, I learnt about the meaning of opening prayers at special meetings, and igloo building, as well as the “marginal”, every-day, material logistics that are part of land-based monitoring research projects in the Arctic, like car repairs, cargo transport, seasonal travel, and getting stuck for days during my regional travels multiple times due to blizzards and cancelled flights.		The company for us to be- and think with in this knowledge-land-scape varies, but emerges for a large part from the encounters I had as I threaded my way through my fieldwork in the hamlets of Uqsuqtuuq (Gjoa Haven) and Salliq (Coral Harbour) of Kitikmeot- and Kivalliq regions in the territory of Nunavut respectively.

	All ~~those day~~-to~~-day practices hold possibilities~~ to ~~become spaces of cross~~-~~cultural exchange~~ and ~~knowledge co-production that move beyond data~~. ~~The difference between those who do~~, ~~and those who don't materialize in such, what~~ I ~~call~~, ~~‘aesthetic encounters’~~, ~~lies in how~~ well ~~we recognize and manage to respond to each other and our intra~~-~~dependencies. Cut 2: "Aesthetic Action" is all about exploring what kind~~ of ~~spaces open up through such aesthetic encounter~~, ~~and what possibilities for cross-cultural exchange~~, ~~beyond data~~, ~~become possible within them. This cut: Wayfaring the BearWatch Project~~, ~~is all about recognizing such possibilities~~ and ~~the process of responding~~ to ~~them through a practice of wayfaring~~.		I was, for example invited to join along with caribou hunts, joined in with ice-fishing, rode an All-Terrain Vehicle to camp out at a fishing weir, collected ice, and took rides in the back of a qamutik (sled) to spend time at cabins, or check on breathing-holes and dens of seals. Within the communities, I learnt about the meaning of opening prayers at special meetings, and igloo building, as well as the “marginal”, every-day, material logistics that are part of land-based monitoring research projects in the Arctic, like car repairs, cargo transport, seasonal travel, and getting stuck for days during my regional travels multiple times due to blizzards and cancelled flights.

	~~<div class="next_choice">You notice the seeming similarities between Indigenous, monist ontologies,~~ and ~~"intra~~-~~dependency" as put forward here, citing Karen Barad and Tim Ingold~~. ~~Make a choice:~~		All those day-to-day practices hold possibilities to become spaces of cross-cultural exchange and knowledge co-production that move beyond data.

	"~~Stay with~~ the ~~Trouble~~" to ~~explore how these ideas holds up against the principle~~ of ~~"respecting difference" that you encountered earlier~~.		This cut, "Wayfaring the BearWatch Project", is all about recognizing such possibilities and responding to them through a practice of wayfaring.

	~~Alternatively~~, ~~allow yourself to be redirected~~ to ~~a different cut in space and time~~, ~~and detour~~ to Cut 2: Aesthetic Action.</div>		Cut 2, "Aesthetic Action", is all about exploring what kind of spaces open up through such aesthetic encounter

			<div class="next_choice">You notice apparent similarities between "intra-dependency" as I have put forward here, and Indigenous, monist ontologies.


			Make a choice:

			'''"Stay with the Trouble"''' to explore how these ideas holds up against the principle of "respecting difference" that you encountered earlier.

			Or,


			'''"Detour"''' to Cut 2 explore more on Aesthetic Action. You will not return here.</div>

	<span class="detour to-cut-2 link" data-page-title="Aesthetic_Action" data-section-id="5" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Aesthetic Action#Aesthetic (in)action in BearWatch\|Detour to Cut 2: "Aesthetic Action"]]</span>		<span class="detour to-cut-2 link" data-page-title="Aesthetic_Action" data-section-id="5" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Aesthetic Action#Aesthetic (in)action in BearWatch\|Detour to Cut 2: "Aesthetic Action"]]</span>

	<span class="pop-up stay-with-the-trouble link" data-page-title="Ethics_of_Response-Ability" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="Stay_with_the_trouble">[[Ethics of Response-Ability\|Stay with the trouble: Ethics of Response-Ability]]</span>		<span class="pop-up stay-with-the-trouble link" data-page-title="Ethics_of_Response-Ability" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="Stay_with_the_trouble">[[Ethics of Response-Ability\|Stay with the trouble: Ethics of Response-Ability]]</span>