Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Knowledge-land-scape
Search
Search
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
The Wayfarer Vista
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
[[File:Vista.png|thumb]] As a researcher, you either move through the world in response to the emergent gestures and the existence of others, or you don’t. Too many concepts, principles and terms originating from indigenous places of beginning are applied in ways that Tuck and Yang would call metaphorical moves to innocence (Tuck & Yang, 2012). Zoe Todd points to how words (or approaches) are appropriated on paper, without attaching meaningful and transformative practices and gestures to them. Shawn Wilson writes, in his book ‘Research is Ceremony’, about ‘writing "bread" on a piece of paper and eating the paper instead of having the bread’ (Wilson, 2008 p.103). This might seem like a weird approach when it comes to engaging with research (or eating bread for that matter). Yet, this is exactly what happens when researchers describe in their proposals how they will ‘ethically engage’ with Indigenous knowledge in their proposals, but then fail to practice their research in correspondence with such protocols. They ‘’eat the paper instead’’. To ethically engage with Indigenous principles and protocols like for example the National Inuit strategy on Research (2018), the Circumpolar Inuit Protocols for Equitable and Ethical Engagement (2020), or even conceptual models like the Ethical Space of Engagement (Ermine, 2007) means to depart from tracing them as predetermined scripts. Instead of “incorporating” or “applying” ethical principles in research design or proposals, they rather need to be emergently “practiced” in responsive collaboration with Inuit and the land. Understanding Knowledge conciliation to be part of such practices and processes, rather than a stage of data collection or processing, reconceptualized knowledge in similar ways. Knowledge is, like ethical principles, not a static pool of resources to include in one’s research. Knowledge is something one does. Knowledge as something more practical/tacit that flows in-between, among, and around different performative bodies is often not acknowledged in more positivist traditions of science, that seek objective and representative measurability. It’s actively regenerated across time and space. <span class="return to-cut-1 link" data-page-title="Voices_of_Thunder" data-section-id="5" data-encounter-type="return">[[Voices of Thunder#3.2 Multiple voices|Return to Voices of Thunder]]</span> <span class="return to cut 3 link" data-page-title="Wayfaring_the_BW_project_Point_of_Beginning" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="return">[[Wayfaring the BW project Point of Beginning#Fieldtrip BW team Coral Harbour Summer 2021|Return to Wayfaring the BW project]]</span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Knowledge-land-scape may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Knowledge-land-scape:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Toggle limited content width