Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Knowledge-land-scape
Search
Search
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Politics of Recognition
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
[[File:Great white beast small.png|thumb]] You have encountered a “Great White Beast”, a fleeting, shapeshifting figure that performs the world as indeterminate. The possibilities of encountering a Great White Beast is a reminder that there are no right decisions to be made, but that we are nevertheless to hold ourselves accountable to our own choices. The Gjoa Haven HTA seeks recognition for the impacts that their community has suffered from the impacts of polar bear harvest quota reductions, and one of the ways in which they expect to gain such recognition is through the publication of an academic article. But what does it mean for scientists to generate “recognition” through academic publishing, if they are themselves part of those institutional hegemonies that not only enabled to bestow, or withhold, such recognition - but have also co-effected the impacts that recognition is sought out for. Glen Coulthard, referring to such contradictions, critiques ‘recognition’ as a promise ‘to reproduce the very configurations of colonial power that Indigenous demands for recognition have historically sought to transcend’<ref>Coulthard, G. S. (2007 p.437). Subjects of empire: Indigenous peoples and the ‘politics of recognition’in Canada. Contemporary political theory, 6, 437-460.</ref> '''You seek to be responsive towards Gjoa Haven’s needs, while you also want to acknowledge the tensions that are connected to collaborating with Gjoa Haven’s HTA towards recognition. You can't "just" keep going here - whatever move you make in response to Gjoa Haven's appael entails a decision for which you hold accountability. So, what shall you do?''' <div class="next_choice"> '''"Do nothing"'''. You do not want to be complicit. Or, '''"Lean into such tensions"'''. (Re)negotiate your position as an implicated subject and find responsive approaches to engage with Gjoa Haven’s experiences. Go check out a nearby '''"Wrecksite"''' to find out more about the larger science-based conservation apparatus that the BearWatch project, and by extent, our actions are entangled with.</div> <small><references /></small> <span class="detour link" data-page-title="Do Nothing" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Do Nothing|Detour: Do Nothing]]</span> <span class="pop-up wrecksite link" data-page-title="Science based Conservation" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="wrecksite">[[Science based Conservation|Wrecksite: Science-based Conservation]]</span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Knowledge-land-scape may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Knowledge-land-scape:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Toggle limited content width