Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Knowledge-land-scape
Search
Search
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Politics of In-action and Refusal
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
[[File:Great white beast small.png|thumb]] In community-based research, actions shape rather than just document reality. They can potentially create transformative ethical engagements across generations and cultures, like arguably happened with the igloo building in Gjoa Haven. However, when attempts are made to pre-emptively announce such activities as ethical practices while there are relational tensions connected to the research - like was the case in Coral Harbour- there is a risk that frameworks like the Ethical Space of Engagement are co-opted, and performed as symbolic gestures rather than as meaningful encounters. Claiming failure, may be a powerful way of resisting and refusing co-optation in such instances, rather than allowing for critical or Indigenous frameworks to be absorbed or neutralized. As Sara Ahmed writes: "Feminist work is often about pushing against structures that do not move; we might push and push, and yet those structures remain in place. To persist in pushing against what does not move is to become fragile; we are worn down by what we come up against.<ref>Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. In On being included. Duke University Press.</ref>" Likewise, Sara Ahmed argues that "inaction" as the withdrawal from oppressive structures can be more powerful than trying to change them from within: "βNot participating in an inheritance can be an action; not going along with something can be an action. We might refuse to inherit the spaces that we are given<ref>Ahmed, S. (2017 p. 136). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373377</ref>.β <div class="next_choice">'''What would you do?''' '''"Refuse"''' to take an active part in organizing the final workshops in Coral Harbour any further. or, '''"Claim Failure"''', and resist the co-optation of ethical space into the project reporting.</div> <small><references /></small> <span class="detour link" data-page-title="Refuse" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Refuse|Detour:Refuse]]</span> <span class="detour link" data-page-title="Claim Failure" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Claim Failure|Detour:Claim Failure]]</span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Knowledge-land-scape may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Knowledge-land-scape:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Toggle limited content width