Editing Ethics of Response-Ability

[[File:Great white beast small.png|thumb]]

You have encountered a “Great White Beast”, a fleeting, shapeshifting figure that performs the world as indeterminate. 

The ethics involved when it comes to drawing from research paradigms that consider the world as indeterminate, intra-dependent and ontologically generative, cannot be resolved through ‘right’ ways of doing things<ref>Rosiek, J., & Adkins-Cartee, M. (2023). Diffracting structure/agency dichotomies, wave/particle dualities, and the citational politics of settler colonial scholars engaging Indigenous studies literature. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 23(2), 157-169.</ref>.

<div class="next_choice">Non-Indigenous researchers engaging any form of generative ontologies need to take responsibility for whichever option they choose: 

'''Engaging Indigenous scholarship.'''


Or, 


'''Not engaging Indigenous scholarship.'''

Neither option is “innocent.” There are no "easy ways out".</div>


<small><references /></small>

<span class="detour to-cut-3 link" data-page-title="Engage Indigenous Scholarship" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Engage Indigenous Scholarship|Detour: Engage Indigenous Scholarship]]</span>

<span class="detour to-cut-3 link" data-page-title="Not Engaging Indigenous Scholarship" data-section-id="0" data-encounter-type="detour">[[Not Engaging Indigenous Scholarship|Detour: Do Not Engage Indigenous Scholarship]]</span>