Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Knowledge-land-scape
Search
Search
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Arctic Masculinities
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
Arctic ‘wildernesses’, can be seen as sites for the enactment of a specific white, hetero-masculinity associated with physical strength, roughness, ingenuity, and self-realization (Sandilands & Ericson, 2010). BearWatch co-PI van Coeverden-de Groot refers to an example of such enactment, through comparing his style of conducting research with that of Ernest Shackleton: ''I fashion myself after Ernest Shackleton. Acknowledged as the greatest explorer, Arctic explorer. But the most disorganized. Right?'' ''But he never lost a man.'' ''He never lost a man. Because you either say you're disorganized, or bad luck happens to you all the time.'' ''Which one is it? But he never lost a man, and his most memorable feat was rowing 300, 700 miles in this little open wooden boat to get to a whaling station to send back a ship to pick up his crew that was abandoned on an iceberg that was slowly melting. Which he did. But he got this rep... ''He's also the Arctic explorer that didn't die. They went to both poles and didn't die. But the narrative is that it [his expeditions] was in shambles. '' (Co-PI van Coeverden de Groot, 2023, post-workshop interview). Such sites of enactment (can) extend into scientific spaces, like laboratories or lecture rooms, reproducing hegemonic masculinities and perpetuating racial and gender inequalities and unequal power relations (MacGregor & Seymour, 2017). Drag has the potential to de-naturalize and unsettle such masculinities by embodying its technologies as separable from sex. Such masculinity, as performed through drag then becomes liminal, a place beyond categories – a space of play; ‘the betwixt and between’ through which shape-shifting figures turn things on their heads and pass on their way from one state of being to another (Rosenfeld, 2003). Taking these techniques and applying them not so much towards normative categories of gender, but towards norms upheld within western scientific spaces, opens our understanding of its conventions and social contracts in similar ways. Drag can thus, shift fixed positions, and transform everyday expectations and habits, that allows us to not only conduct transformative research – but also transform the researcher itself. <span class="return to-cut-2 link" data-page-title="Point of Beginning Mx. Science" data-section-id="7" data-encounter-type="return">[[Point of Beginning Mx. Science#Annual Scientific Meeting Mx. Science|Return to Cut 2: Annual Scientific Meeting Mx. Science]]</span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Knowledge-land-scape may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Knowledge-land-scape:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Toggle limited content width