Editing Experiment (section)

=Design notes for Camilo:=


'''Wikimedia Page'''= Cut/Track/Manuscript (generative action/physical manifestation/Academic format)

A page is a run-on, linear narrative '''track''' that '''cuts''' along the KLS, which makes it possible for the reader to '''trace''' an academic '''manuscript''' These tracks have a '''point of beginning''', and they end at '''another point of beginning'''

Sometimes a narrative cut/track splits off in multiple different branches. In this case the page end with the heading after which narrative track branches out. Links are offered to multiple "new" points of beginning under this last heading. This for example happens in cut2; 3. Aesthetic (in)action in BearWatch, which splits of into 2 "new" places of beginning (and also has a "hidden" third "new" place of beginning).




===Different linking logics, use of terms and syntax:===


====Run-of-the-page tracks====


Run-of-the-page tracks that can be traced as a linear cut through the KLS, are marked in Miro by a '''solid arrow'''

When people follow one cut linearly, they are "tracing" this narrative. There is not a lot of interaction, or transformative engagement taking place. When people choose to interact with the possibilities that are offered to divert or pivot on the way, it means that they are "threading" their own narrative. Such threading is intra-active between reader, writer, designer, and all the other more-than-human manifestive agents that shape the KLS.

=====Front-end options?=====


Rather than reading the text through a scroll-down format, I would like to see if there is a possibility to move "through" it, per (sub)heading. See thumb below?

As they engage with different kind of content (points of beginning, research creation etc.) maybe there can be a visual style to that (if we have time)



====Detours and return links====

"Detours" and "returns" allow for users to '''thread''' their own narratives between cuts. They are marked in Miro by a striped arrow in a particular direction. They exist in 2 versions: 

'''Detour''' ('''Black striped arrow in Miro''')

'''Return'''('''Purple striped arrow in Miro''') I have started to take some of these out




====Redirections====

"Redirections allow readers to '''wayfare''' or '''dwell'''- to be curious, to divert from previous trajectories, "waste" time and be curious. It is actually the main action that I hope my readers will engage in- and is also the most effective way to '''encounter''' "hidden" '''vistas''' and '''landmarks''' along the way.

There are two kinds of redirections: ( '''thin dotted black line''' in Miro)

===='''Pressure ridges'''====

"Pressure ridges" are re-directive agential forces that mark the '''de/limitations''' of the KLS, and the '''im/possibilities''' of how we can move through it. It's a referral to the agential forces and apparatuses at play which mark the extent of possibilities within a particular generative action - in this case it marks the boundaries of what is included in the KLS, and it also marks the '''boundaries''' of the extent that users can make tracing/threading/wayfaring choices. User decision-making in their wayfaring choices may be generative of insights to the degree that the KLS gives them options to choose, limiting such directional choices marks that not everything is possible within a given phenomena, including this KLS.

'''Invitations''' and '''Ice-pressure ridges''' 

As you respond to a redirective force you follow a trail-off. This trail may connect multiple invites or ice-pressure ridges marked in Miro by post-its, or just one. The trail usually picks up where you left the track, or it will include return links.

===Different Pop-up phenomena in wikimedia and the KLS: their terms, Miro-design and syntax===

Pop-up phenomena are phenomena that either; de/markate the im/possibilities of the KLS, like '''Staying with the trouble''' and '''Shipwrecks''', or ones that help navigating the KLS, like '''Landmarks''' and '''Vista''''


=====Front-end options?=====

op ups are material '''agents'''. They create the conditions under which, or alongside which, the user makes their decisions. Or they may '''perform''' clarifying moments. Due to this nature, I envision them as visually intrusive '''pop-up'''' elements, that you may click to explore and understand better through reading the accompanying text. But even if you do not want '''explore''' those phenomena further, you cannot ignore them in the first place. This means I need to design a visual element that can serve as a click-able pop-up for each category.

Pop-ups are marked in Miro with '''thick dotted lines''' in different colours 


====Wrecksites====

The difference between what can exist, and what can not exist as part of a phenomena, are produced within phenomena by the '''im/material agencies of the (inquiring) apparatus-in encounter''' that constantly make and remake such determining agential cuts. ‘Our inquiries, in other words, do not simply generate knowledge, they generate realities’ (Rosiek, in Leavy, 2017 p. 638). The ice pressure ridge, mentioned above, is just one example of such material agency within the apparatus in encounter. Here and there, the '''wrecksites''' of the larger settler-colonial state apparatus also '''reveal themselves''' as materially constitutive agents in the KLS. 

Where they reveal themselves in the Miro they are marked by '''thick red dotted lines''' in Miro.

(I may decide to leave these phenomena out, as I fear they might not be "material enough" - or may be the same as pressure ridges)



====stay with the trouble====

Staying with the trouble is to encounter a Great White Beast, it reminds us that there are no right decisions to be made. The responsive decisions that were made during the processes which have shaped the KLS. It is a form of making myself accountable. When the world is ‘remade’ in each meeting, it means that there is an imperative to take responsibility for the intra-active relations you build and the future relations your research makes possible or forecloses (Barad, 2007 p.x; see also Rosiek & Adkins-Cartee, 2023 p.160). Considering that the relations between reader and author are partially influenced by the positionality of the researcher, the methods they use and the concepts they apply, each research generates knowledge that is particular to its specific ‘agential cut’ (Barad 2007, p. 185). Wrecksites provide insights into my own my abilities to respond and '''"stay with the trouble"'''.

trouble will pop-up in various forms, and their pop-up nature is marked in Miro with '''thick green dotted lines'''.


====Landmark====

Landmarks perform emergent insights in response to tracing and threading certain sequential actions or practices. As you are re-redirected by pressure ridges and enticed to trail-off along certain sidetracks, you are presented with particular insights. These insights are directly connected to your responsive and immersive engagement with other agents of the KLS. Did you partake in coffee breaks, bingo, trying country food, and give people rides? To the dump for example? Or to get ice? This is where much of the ethical engagement takes place- and as such they are almost exclusively presented at side-trails, or along pressure ridges.

Landmarks can take various forms. i will design visuals for each one. ('''In the Miro they are marked with a blue dotted line''').




====Vista====

Vistas, or ethical principles, function to '''assist''' in your orientation as you may seek to ethically engage with some of the work that you encounter along the way. Vistas unveil the ethical outlines on which I have relied to chart my course across the knowledge-land-scape of my research. They are emergent aspirational guidelines that may help guide you along the different tracks and trails you intra-act with. These trails are, after all, shaped by my personal considerations and response-abilities while I navigated this scape.

Vista's can take various forms. i will design visuals for each one. ('''In the Miro they are marked with a blue dotted line.''')

==Legend:==

The final legend will be included on the [[Exploring Polar Bear Research as Ethical Space, Practice and Process of Engagement: Knowledge-land-scape|welcome/landing page]]

[[File:Screenshot 2024-11-05 183437.png|border|caption]]

==Landing page:==

Here you can find the [[Exploring Polar Bear Research as Ethical Space, Practice and Process of Engagement: Knowledge-land-scape|landingpage]]

Here you can find an oversight of [[Welcome to Knowledge-land-scape#Welcome page|all the pages]]

==Front-end wishlist/desires==

I am in general just very open to your suggestions.

'''Here are some wishlist items (mostly for myself to note)'''

'''03-12-2024'''

-Navigation buttons, better to pop up immediately

-"One step back" button

'''21-11-2024'''

At the end a map appears with greyed out elements where the user didnt go, and colour-poping parts of the map where they did end up going.

Maybe I can hyperlink texts, that show up as suggested "connected moments" across time/not choices for navigation (Moments, events and encounters that together emerge as an idea)



'''And these are conceptually important to me:'''


I hope to eventually create a body-on-the-ground experience (navigating "in" the KLS)- instead of the bird-eye perspective of a map (reading "about" the KLS). The Miro map can be a resource for people, if they want, but I think it is cooler if they can navigate without (see for example the https://feralatlas.supdigital.org/). This sketch maybe clarifies what I was describing this afternoon.

[[File:In the kls.jpg|thumb]]


The interface of this link, makes use of the story frames of navigating "in" the KLS as sketched above: https://fielddaylab.wisc.edu/play/headlines/

while this one is a good example of a scrolling site that still gives you the impression of navigating "through" - although that has much to do with the fact that there is little writing involved: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-32057601

Some other ideas:

Different visual formats/colours for each cut/research creation/points of beginning