Editing Experiment (section)

=Process documentation:=

<HTML><iframe width="768" height="432" src="https://miro.com/app/live-embed/uXjVPqe-Kok=/?moveToViewport=-5338,-1404,3581,2917&embedId=657691384604" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allow="fullscreen; clipboard-read; clipboard-write" allowfullscreen></iframe> </html>

'''19-11-2024'''

ESE vista's, maybe one for each cut. Each one corresponding mor eexplicitely to practice, process and space!!!!

Cspan links added for the whole of Cut 1. i also realized that there there needs to be some guiding text at the bottom, that introduces the choices. this is so that the "buttons" stay small enough. 

However it really, changes the directionality of writing, because there is somewhat of a dialogue. And agency in-between reader and author. this is now also wrapped in its own style.

'''14-11-2024'''

I made a change on the Workshop Summer 2019 heading on the detour link to TEK workshops. But later I thought that perhaps Camilo had made a change by putting detour links sperate. Not sure what to do. So I stopped editting the linking structure at those places of cut 3 that intersect with cut 1.

'''05-11-2024'''

Collage vista's and landmarks?
Categorize different pop-up pages, ridges and trails? 


'''30-10-2024'''

Ask Camilo to install https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cite  this is for [[Voices of Thunder#Response-ability]]

Also discuss how and where to put the references (each header?) AND at the end of each thread?

'''28-10-2024'''

Start thinking of visual language. I want a partial on-the-ground perspective with a horizon that indicates landmarks and vista's that help navigating, not a god's eye perspective. Could I generate a 3D model with Echo of my miro board? and then render and sketch out the horizon? for each heading? Or will I sketch different landmarks as they emerge when following the cut. Or both?

Start adding reference pictures here.

'''27-10-2024'''

[[Politics of recognition]] is an example of unresolvable tension, without any right way of doing things.
In Invivo- I have marked these as "staying with the trouble" - They should pop-up as a category, at certain points of each cut. Like the other "vista's". They are added as bold in-text page links

I have started to think of categories for these "pop-ups": External influence/agential apparatus of PB monitoring, conservation, natural science etc./pressure ridges - Emergent insights/landmarks - Imaginaries that can function as buoys/vista's.

Navigation levels are now as follows I think (see Miro graph visualization): 

'''Run-of-the page''' = cut (solid line) - doesn't avoid certain agential pressure ridges see below like covid or arctic travel.

'''In text links''' = are non-linear options/ reader agency to (re)turn to other cuts (striped line)

'''Bold in text links bottom of heading''' = 

Either Green and purple post-its wayfaring invitations, to respond - or to be re-directed by agential pressure ridges (marked in miro by dotted line)

Or Vista's and landmarks = suggested "pop-ups" only when reader hits certain post-its. (those are the emergent insights around the ESE).

'''25-10-2024'''

The Wayfaring thread ''is'' a linear cut, it follows the BW project process. I add headers on level 4 and 5:

====level 4====  
is response-ability/choices/ethical considerations

=====level 5===== 
is External material agencies / pressure ridges

Not sure what to do with [[Politics of recognition]] yet - how it is connected to wayfaring (see 27-10 for further thought).


'''24-10-2024'''

Maybe wayfaring thread cut is indeed not linear, but has a point of beginning and weaves throughout the 2 other cuts.
-Wayfaring is the ''process.''
-The ESE are the in-between ''spaces'' that emerge while wayfaring. These spaces are their own pages? Like the vista's suggested below?
-The 2 cuts are the ''practices''

'''15-10-2024'''

What if the vista's / landmarks emerge on the "horizon", when one hits certain "sidequests?" 


'''14-10-2024'''

The narrative can't be the manuscript. because it is a knowledge product. 
The manuscript is then the decisions I made, and the process of an emergent project. 
So the ''encounters'' and the ''choices'' that each connect, or lay out a certain path. For example you can go straight from the [[Workshops Summer 2019|workshops]] page to the [[Voices of Thunder#output|output]] if you want - skipping the problematizing of "description".

Maybe each encounter (page, or subheading) is an ethical space of engagement, were different interests come together?
This means that the previous decisions made (like the workshops in 2019 in my case), lead to the current encounter. 

'''11-10-2024:'''

Cut 1: The page runs as the voices of thunder narrative (written out) 
       
Place of beginning as an introduction of this thread, explaining what the thread is about, and in what way you as a reader/ researcher are invited to respond.

The cut is threaded with other intra-acting aesthetic actions like the workshop in 2019, the conference calls, the paper, the film, the website, which are each (running) pages themselves


'''06-10-2024:'''

Practice: aesthetic action (this is what I/we did - the paths of the map).

Space: corresponding ethics of willingness and boundaries (These are the different corresponding agential forces, e.g. refusal, care, curiosity).

Process: Wayfaring in the apparatus (this is the directional force - exerted by reader).

The logic I am trying out first is adding whole Manuscripts/cuts (aesthetic action) in 1 page and then adding its corresponding forces through links.








== Here my H2 ==

My ''text'' can go here. Well or not [[Well-written]] is just part of the '''process.''' 

[[File:Screenshot 2024-09-12 at 15.28.51.png|300px]]


<poem>
Here.     i 

:: am.                   camilo 

there.   me 

bee
</poem>

<code> 
create.        this 

type of    content
</code>

{{CURRENTPAGE}}
{{CURRENTTIME}}
{{CURRENTUSER}}
{{NUMBEROFPAGES}}